Eastside Neighbors Forum Rocks!

FORUM A GREAT SUCCESS
The Eastside Costa Mesa Neighbors Group City Council candidate forum Thursday night was a huge success despite, or maybe because of, the absence of four of the seven candidates.

THREE OUTSTANDING CANDIDATES SHOWED UP
Sandra Genis, Jay Humphrey and John Stephens showed up as planned, while the other four failed to make it.  Rumor had it that at least some of them may have been raising cash at a gin mill not too far away.  No, not Gary's.  It's really too bad the rest chose to boycott this event because, as usual, it was the best of the bunch.  The questions were well-thought-out and evoked good answers from each candidate.  Each one was given the same amount of time to answer and there was no sparring amongst the candidates.  I venture to say that if the remainder showed up that probably would not be the case.

MC CONVILLE TO WEITZBERG
The evening began as Eastside Neighbors Group President Jeff McConville promptly  kicked things off at 7:00 p.m., then tossed the moderator ball to Harold Weitzberg, who did a fine job of presenting the issues to the candidates.  The questions were crisp, as were most of the answers, and the program stayed right on schedule.  I'm going to try to give you a flavor of the evening, and may even manage a few direct quotes, but much of what I present to you here will be paraphrasing the questions and answers.  Terry Wall was on site recording this event again.  His finished work product will be available for viewing sometime next week.  I'll provide you a link when it's up.

FIRST, THE BALLOT MEASURES
After personal introductions by the candidates, Weitzberg  announced that the next segment would involve a discussion of the many ballot measures facing Costa Mesa voters in November.

MEDICAL MARIJUANA ISSUES
He launched into the first question, which dealt with the three local issues on the Costa Mesa ballot regarding Medical Marijuana - Measures V, W and X.  Measures V and W were placed on the ballot by gathering of enough signatures of voters last year.  Measure X was generated by the city council majority. He asked each candidate for their views on the issues and whether they will vote for them.  I'll provide answers in the order asked, which changed throughout the evening.

Humphrey
Jay Humphrey was the first to answer this one.  He said he understood the need for some ill people to get relief from Medical Marijuana and didn't want to do anything to hamper that relief.  He didn't like the idea of the product being sold in our city, so said he will vote NO on V and W, and may vote yes on X, the city-created measure that has no retail sales element in it, just manufacturing, testing, distribution kind of functions restricted to a specific section in the north part of town.

Stephens
John Stephens mentioned the fact that Recreational Marijuana - on the November ballot - will likely pass, but he didn't think dispensaries in Costa Mesa was a good idea.  He mentioned the need for a state agency like the ABC to manage the product.  He said he will vote NO on V and W and yes on X.

Genis
Sandra Genis acknowledged that some folks really need medical cannabis.  She cited the need for more state controls.  She will vote NO on V and W and, probably, Yes on X.

DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH
Next up was the issues of Development and Growth.  There are two issues on the ballot - Measures Y and Z.

Stephens
Stephens said he'd be voting NO on Z.  However, he was having a tough time with Measure Y.  He acknowledged why more than 7,000 people in Costa Mesa signed the petition to get it on the ballot - rampant growth throughout the city - but suggested a better way to change the way development is handled in Costa Mesa would be to change the demographics on the council dais.

Genis
Genis also praised the folks who got Measure Y on the ballot.  She said it's not perfect, but it reins-in the wholesale changes approved by the current council.  She said Measure Z is a "wolf in sheep's clothing" placed on the ballot by the council majority, and that the voters are being lied to on this issue.

Humphrey
Humphrey, a main proponent of Measure Y, said he would vote NO on Z.  He briefly expressed the mood of those who signed the petition to place Measure Y on the ballot as frustrated, with a feeling of powerlessness, at the rampant growth in the city.

FAIRVIEW PARK ISSUES
Next came a question about the measures on the ballot involving Fairview Park, Measures AA and BB.

Genis
Genis said she will vote Yes on AA and No on BB, another measure placed on the ballot to confuse the voters.

Humphrey
Humphrey said he will vote NO on BB, also emphasizing the attempt to fool the voters.  He will vote Yes on AA.

Stephens
Stephens agreed with them, and used his time to explain his view of the lies being perpetrated on the voters by the council majority by the placement of these measures on the ballot.  He express outrage that not only did they place BB and Z on the ballot, but are spending our tax dollars to promote them.

DISTRICT VOTING ISSUE
The next issue was Measure EE, the district voting issue on the ballot.

Humphrey
Humphrey said he's against EE, but agreed that it is important for the city to go to selecting council members by district and also to retain the existing term limits.

Stephens
Stephens said this measure is another example of the perversion of the process.  He briefly explained that we should have districts because of our large Latino population.  He explained how this measure really doesn't accomplish the intent - to give a greater voice to the Latino population in our city.  He said he will vote No on EE, but will do everything he can to get district voting approved with a Latino majority district.

Genis
Genis told the audience that she had offered a substitute motion - a 5-district option that had been preferred by the participants at the many workshops on this issue.  Not a single person supported the 6-district with directly-elected mayor choice that was placed on the ballot.  She cited this as another example of abuse of power at City Hall.  She will vote No on EE.

MESA WATER HOSTILE TAKEOVER MEASURE
Next came Measure TT, the advisory issue placed on the ballot by the Mesa Water District to test the sentiment of the voters on whether Mesa Water and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) should be combined.

Stephens
Stephens said he will vote NO because he didn't like the way it went down.  He suggested the proper forum for this discussion was the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).

Humphrey
Humphrey agreed and will also be voting NO.  He said this is simply a power grab and also agreed with Stephens that LAFCO is the place for this discussion.

Genis
Genis agreed - she, too, will vote NO.  She said there is no clear reason for this to even be on the ballot.  She cited the one-sided financial study by Mesa Water, which was completed without the cooperation of the CMSD.  She suggested that maybe the Costa Mesa Sanitary District should investigate taking over the Water District.

QUESTIONS FROM THE HOSTS
Next they tackled questions posed by the host organization based on input from their membership.  Each candidate was asked to respond to each issue again.

HIGH DENSITY HOUSING/GENERAL PLAN/OVERLAYS
First up in this segment was High Density Housing, the General Plan Update and the Overlay Zones along Harbor and Newport Boulevard.  The candidates were asked if they agree with them and, if not, what they will do about it.

Genis
Genis said she did not agree with them and voted against them several times. She said they produce areas that are too dense, with too much traffic - much of which will end up being cut-through traffic on the Eastside.  And, she said it will result in no affordable housing in Costa Mesa.

Humphrey
Humphrey said he disagrees with the General Plan changes, citing the density and traffic, too.  He said it's just a land grab for developers.  He said those changes MUST not be codified.

Stephens
Stephens said he is against the Overlay Zones because they will change the character of our city.  He referred the audience to the development at 125 Baker Street, where a huge apartment complex with multi-story parking structure is being built.  He said there's a lot of lying being done by the council majority regarding the so-called "problem motels".  He said it's a myth being used to oust those properties, and cited an apartment complex in town as having the highest calls for service.

SOBER LIVING HOMES
Next came a question about Unlicensed Sober Living Homes, which Weitzberg said the city - 4% of the county population - has 29% of such homes.  He asked if they felt the laws were adequate to enforce?

Humphrey
Humphrey said they are not being enforced.  He cited the two laws on the books are not adequate, but acknowledged the need for sober living homes.  He cited the over-abundance of them in some neighborhoods and that we need to do a better job of forcing them to be better neighbors.

Genis
Genis acknowledged the need for sober living homes, but said our ordinances need more teeth and that we need to work with other agencies to help solve the problems - lobbying in Sacramento and Washington to get better laws.

Stephens
Stephens said he could talk a half hour on the issue, and would stick around after the meeting if anyone was interested.  He affirmed that the addicts are protected by the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).  He suggested a Nuisance Abatement Fund be created to help deal with the problems.  He said many residents with sober living homes in their neighborhoods feel "hopeless and helpless".

PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE STAFFING
Next came a question about Public Safety, specifically about Police Staffing, and asked what we should do to attract more experienced officers.

Stephens
Stephens said "Elect Me!"  He said the city is a service business but that we currently have a "siege mentality" at City Hall against the police and that it's out of control on the dais and is constantly discussed on social media - he specifically didn't mention any site in particular.  Citing the obvious acrimony that is well-publicized, he said, "I wouldn't want to hire an officer who didn't know how police officers are treated in Costa Mesa."

Genis
Genis said we need to establish an atmosphere of respect.  She said the relationship with the police department has reached a critical point, and that the fact that we have no specialty units makes it hard to find experienced officers for lateral transfers, which is already a slow process.  She praised Police Chief Rob Sharpnack for his diligence in trying to manage this problem.

Humphrey
Humphrey told us the reality is the toxic atmosphere that has existed for more than 5 years.  Many senior officers took early retirement or looked for other jobs where their skills were appreciated.  And, the council majority imposed a hiring freeze, which put recruitment behind for nearly a year.  He looked forward to helping the CMPD become a premiere department again, and that it will take a change of attitude to attract laterals to the force.

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Next came a question about Emergency Preparedness.  The candidates were asked if they feel we are adequately prepared to handle a major emergency - a terrorist act or a natural disaster.

Humphrey
Humphrey said that concern is very real and cited the recent Trump Rally, which ended up being a riot and caused  more than $290,000 in damage.  He said there was not enough notification to and by the Fairgrounds and there was no plan to which they could refer.

Genis
Genis mentioned the emergency generator which she, and Wendy Leece before her, had tried to get purchased for years without success.  She mentioned one member of the council majority who asked, apparently seriously, "Why should we have something that we will never have to use?"  She mentioned that our Emergency Operations Plan had not been updated for years, when Chief  Tom Gazsi finally got it done.  She said we have NO Hazard Management plan.  She also referred to the current practice of having public safety personnel work so many hours of overtime - thousands in many cases - that they might not be physically ready for a major disaster/emergency.

Stephens
Stephens said it kind of depends on the kind of emergency.  He mentioned a recent conversation with an official in north county that said something like, "Why worry about a fire.  Other departments will come to your aid."  He said we need to get our staffing levels in both the Police and Fire Departments up to the required level soon.

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA
Next up was a question about Marijuana, specifically the possibility of Recreational Marijuana being approved by the voters in November.  The candidates were asked, "If it passes, how will it affect Costa Mesa?" and "What steps do we need to take to prepare?"

Stephens
Stephens began by saying he had no problem with adults using marijuana and suggested that anyone in Costa Mesa that wanted marijuana were probably getting all they want already.  He emphasized he didn't believe we needed dispensaries, then mentioned the fact that there are more than 300 places in Costa Mesa where a person can get alcohol, and that 80% of the police calls receive involve drinking.

Humphrey
Humphrey was concerned about it being a cash business, subject to armed robbery.  He expressed the need to take care of the "bad actors" in that business if it evolves.

Genis
Genis said she hopes the State creates an agency like the ABC to manage the product, and emphasized again that some people do receive relief from pain from the product. Weitzberg interjected that there is already an agency being formed.

COSTA MESA HOMELESSNESS
Next they discussed Homelessness in Costa Mesa, defining the problem and looking for solutions.

Genis
Genis said homelessness in Orange County is up, that there are currently and estimated 15 thousand homeless people in the county.  Many are in Costa Mesa.  She mentioned even Avalon, on Catalina Island, has a homelessness problem because the boat gives free passage to the island on your birthday.  She also mentioned we, the City, have been sending HOME funds that could be used for transitional housing for homeless back to Washington.  She said there will be "cap and trade" funds available soon, and that we need permanent supportive housing.

Stephens
Stephens mentioned that he'd recently spent a lot of time with Assistant CEO Rick Francis, the point man on Costa Mesa's battle with the homeless issue.  He has a small team and they're trying to get proper data so they can actually create a plan to deal with it.  He cited faith-based organizations, like Trellis.

Humphrey
Humphrey observed we have more young women homeless in Costa Mesa and blamed it on sober living homes that dump their failures out onto out streets.  He suggested the city become a credit guarantor to assist the homeless get re-established.

BANNING RANCH
Next was Banning Ranch.  It was presumed that the developers would appeal the recent Coastal Commission ruling and be back at it, trying to develop that property.  The candidates were asked to address the impact on Costa Mesa in terms of traffic, noise, clean up of the site, etc.

Humphrey
Humphrey said he would be attending any meeting on the issue.  He said we don't have any control, but that we need to negotiate a better deal to mitigate some of the impacts than the last one - one he said would barely cover half the anticipated impacts.  He suggested we keep an eye on the Coastal Commission to make sure they follow the law.

Stephens
Stephens said he was proud of Genis because she was the only elected official to step up and speak at the recent hearing that quashed the last attempt.  He said that if the three of them were elected, there would be three at those future meetings.  He thanked the opponents of the development, mentioning Terry Welsch in particular.

Genis
Genis said it is going forward and it would generate a lot of traffic in Costa Mesa.  If the Bluff Road is included it will mean even MORE traffic, and that we need to keep fighting it.

CLOSING STATEMENTS
Finally came their closing statements.  They were asked what makes them the best choice for City Council.

Genis
Genis said she was one of three good choices for City Council.  She said she's in it for the long haul, that she has great institutional knowledge about the City and is a professional land planner.  She said she wanted to see the government returned to the people, not continue abridging the rights of the residents.

Humphrey
Humphrey said he's a long-time resident of the city and that when on the council before he worked with Genis when she helped get the City out of the county investment pool before the bankruptcy, saving approximately 40% of our money in the process.  He cited the need to treat people with respect.  He mentioned that every small business, every resident are a major part of our community and that the council needs to hear from the people and respect their opinions.  He said he wants to bring balance back to the City for a sustainable future.

Stephens
Stephens thanked the hosts and Weitzberg.  He said he's a practicing attorney and that he thinks we should stop squandering our tax dollars  on frivolous lawsuits, and that his background could help with that.  He said he would be the residents eyes and ears at City Hall.  He said we could trust him to manage our tax dollars.  He said he knows how to negotiate in good faith.  He said he loves the city, and that he's a nice guy.  He said even Mensinger and Righeimer would agree that he's a nice guy.  He said he wants to listen to the people with Respect, Joy, Dignity and Love.

The meeting ended precisely at 8:30 with closing comments by McConville.  Luke Money from the Daily Pilot, shown below chatting with resident Greg Ridge, was at the meeting, so look for his coverage of the event.

MY THOUGHTS
I came away from this forum with strong positive feelings about all three of these candidates.  It was clear that they agree on most issues, but don't necessarily agree on solutions, but are willing to discuss them.  This is a refreshing change from what we've seen the past five years from the current council majority.  Two of the three, Genis and Humphrey, have significant experience on the City Council and know how good government looks and works.  Stephens is a skilled lawyer and negotiator.  All would be excellent council members and, as a team, they would be terrific.  My sense of the crowd tonight is that most in attendance were very impressed.  I know where my three votes are going later this month when my absentee ballot arrives.

THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED
My Eastside Neighbors did a fantastic job with this forum.  Congratulations to McConville, Weitzberg and to all involved, and to the candidates who took the time to speak to more than 100 of their neighbors on issues that are important to us all.

TO THE NO-SHOWS...
To the other candidates that chose NOT to attend... I have nothing good to say to or about any of you.  By avoiding this opportunity to express your views on these important issues you've demonstrated your arrogant disdain for the voters - something everyone in attendance last night will certainly remember and pass on to their friends.

Harbor Blvd. Median Improvements Discussed

RAJA LED THE DISCUSSION
Tuesday night Costa Mesa Transportation Services Manager Raja Sethuraman led a discussion of the proposed $1 million median project that is planned for Harbor Boulevard between Wilson Street and 19th Street before a small group (fewer than 40) concerned residents and business owners at the Neighborhood Community Center.  Half of the $1 million cost will be covered by a grant.  In response to a couple questions Sethuraman affirmed that we are not in danger of losing that grant money, yet. 

 AN INTERESTING MIX OF ATTENDEES
Among those in attendance were councilwoman Sandra Genis, former council member and council candidate Jay Humphrey, Parks and Recreation Commissioner Kim Pederson and Vice Chairman of the commission Bob Graham, who stopped in for the final few minutes of the meeting.  Daily Pilot reporter Luke Money was in attendance, so look for his story on the meeting soon.  The remainder was a mix of concerned residents who are active in the city on many fronts and some folks brand new to the process, but concerned about this project.  We were told that business owners had been contacted and the project discussed in detail with some of the larger ones - those with the greatest transportation impact, like Robins Ford, Newport Rib Company and the K-Mart Plaza.  We were told that residents within a 500 foot radius of the project area were also contacted.  It was the view of many attendees that insufficient outreach had been done for this meeting.

A CASUAL, CONVERSATIONAL MEETING
For ninety minutes Sethuraman presented an overview of the project, discussed some of the reasoning behind the perceived need for a divider along that stretch of roadway.  The crowd was focused and sometimes impatient as questions were asked and answered. 

CONCERNS ABOUT BUSINESSES
Residents had many questions/concerns.  Most of them involved the impact of small businesses contiguous to this project.  The medians will hamper left turns into and out of many of the existing businesses along that stretch of roadway.  For example, this slide shows the area near Harbor Blvd. and Bay Street, adjacent to Robins Ford.  You will note that left hand turns out of the primary parking lot driveway will be impossible with the medians in place as planned.  Similarly, it would be impossible to turn north out of Tim Lewis' rental yard across the street.  Lewis was not at the meeting.

This slide shows a stretch of Harbor Blvd. just a little further up the street and reflects the same problem.

DECISION BASED ON SAFETY NUMBERS

Sethuraman explained in detail how the decisions were made, using traffic studies.  He explained the safety reasons for this project. Some of those numbers are in the second slide, above.  Basically, by reducing opportunities to make uncontrolled left turns the opportunity for serious accidents is reduced.  He said this project reduces "100 points of contact" to around 10, which should significantly reduce traffic accidents in that nearly 3/4 mile corridor.  He also acknowledged that this project will probably slow traffic in that area.

LANDSCAPE PLANS

He then went into a discussion of the Landscape plans.  There were also charts and photo arrays showing the plant palette being considered, but the images are much too small to be easily-viewed here.  The current plans include using Sycamore trees in the dividers.  This concept will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission at their meeting on Thursday, August 25th, beginning at 6:00 in City Council Chambers.

TIMETABLE
Apparently it will take at least 6-9 months for construction plans to be created, at which time the project will be put out to bid.  At some point in the very near future these slides and others will be available on the City website.  Irrigation and power will be provided to each of the medians.  The plans are still in the process of being fine-tuned to address issues brought up last night.

PROBLEMS
For example, the left turn lane of southbound Harbor Blvd. at 19th Street is presently a nightmare.  It sometimes takes more than two signal cycles to make that turn, which leads folks to the 55 Freeway.  Presently cars back up well past the designated left turn lane into the median lane.  With a more restrictive median in place those cars will remain in the number 1 lane, impeding through traffic.  You may be able to make out that intersection on the image below.

A "TRIAL RUN" USING BARRELS?
One member of the audience suggested some kind of a trial period, where barrels could be used to replicate permanent dividers to study the impact of the restriction of left turn capabilities.  Sethuraman calmly explained that the studies they've done with computer modeling are quite sufficient to make decisions about this project without all the turmoil such a "practice" run would make.

COMPARING IT TO EAST 17TH STREET
Several residents mentioned the similar changes on East 17th Street that were completed within the past year or so.  Initially, some of the elements of that project turned out to be problematic and the Transportation Services organization listened to residents and modified the offending areas.  Sethuraman mentioned that there would be another such meeting, following the Parks and Recreation Commission presentation, at which time the input from this meeting and other community input would be considered and blended into the plans.  When I left shortly before 8 o'clock a dozen people remained in the room, evaluating the charts provided and asking questions of the staff and consultants on hand. 

CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC
I left satisfied that the rationale behind this project is sound and that the safety concerns are valid.  That being said, if it was my choice between spending a million bucks on this project or adding to the public safety staff, I'd go with more cops and firefighters first.  I am willing to listen to the argument, though, that by installing these medians we, in theory, reduce the calls for service in that area by reducing accidents.

More Controversy About Smart Growth Initiative Rebuttal

YET ANOTHER WEIRD TWIST
And yet another curious situation has arisen in the case of Eleanor Egan's lawsuit against Costa Mesa City Clerk Brenda Green and Orange County Registrar of Voters, Neal Kelley, to have segments of the rebuttal to Arguments For the Smart Growth Initiative removed because the document "is not really a rebuttal, since it does not address anything in the Argument For the initiative measure."  She goes on to say, "most of the statements contained in the Rebuttal are demonstrably false, and the rest are not capable of being proven either true or false but are misleading and inconsistent with the requirement of the Elections Code."

CO-CONSPIRATORS
The signatories on this so-called "Rebuttal" are Julie Fowler, Chuck Perry, Lee Ramos, Christopher Bunyan and Jim Righeimer.

BACKGROUND
I wrote about this issue earlier, HERE, and Luke Money wrote about it in the Daily Pilot, HERE.

WE'RE PAYING RIGHEIMER'S LEGAL FEES?!
Now comes the new twist.  Informed sources tell me that the City of Costa Mesa will be covering all legal costs incurred by Jim Righeimer in this matter!  And, further, the attorney that will represent him is Patrick Munoz, the high-priced lawyer from Rutan and Tucker - the firm that was retained to cobble together an initiative to compete with the Costa Mesa First's Smart Growth Initiative.  That certainly has the aroma of conflict of interest.

GREEN, YES... RIGHEIMER, NO!
Now, I can see where the City will represent City Clerk Brenda Green - she is simply doing her job, and Egan's beef isn't with her, nor Neal Kelley.  Her complaint is that the rebuttal is false and misleading, as stated above, and she doesn't want it to appear on the ballot.  I have no problem with Green receiving city-paid-for legal help.

NOT APPROPRIATE, AND MAYBE ILLEGAL!
I DO, however, have a problem with my tax dollars being spent to cover whatever legal costs Righeimer incurs in this venture.  He signed the rebuttal as a private citizen, not as the Mayor Pro Tem of the City.  This issue was NOT addressed by the City Council, nor were they asked to waive conflict of interest - a very likely situation.  Instead, someone high up in City government simply decided to make a gift of taxpayer dollars to Righeimer to cover his legal costs in this misguided, malicous and falacious effort.

WHO AND WHY?!
So, I want to know who made that decision and why?  What authority has been given to whom to make such a decision without council approval or even consideration?  Who decided that it's OK to spend our money to facilitate misleading the voters by placing lies on a ballot measure?  Was it CEO Tom Hatch?  Was it contract City Attorney Tom Duarte?  Just who made that decision?  And, if it's OK to cover Righeimer's legal costs, what about the other four signatories?  If they incur costs will we be paying those, too?  Quite frankly, this stinks!

First Voter District Formation Meeting Report

SPARSE TURNOUT FOR VOTER DISTRICT MEETING
Three dozen of your friends and neighbors - fewer than expected -  attended the consultant-led Voter District Formation meeting last night at the Neighborhood Community Center from 7-9 p.m.  An identical meeting will be held Saturday, June 4th, at the Halecrest Park, 3107 Killybrooke Lane from 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon.  This meeting and the one Saturday were not well-publicized.  If you missed this first one, plan to make the second one on Saturday.

A SECOND ROUND LATER THIS MONTH
Additionally, there will be a second round of community meetings later this month at St. Joachim's Catholic Church, 1964 Orange Avenue on Wednesday, June 15th from 7-9 p.m. and on Saturday, June 18th at Balearic Community Center, 1975 Balearic Drive from 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon.  At these two meetings the results of the data gathered at the first two meetings plus the recently-completed series of "Meet The Expert" mini-meetings will be discussed and more public input will be gathered.

CONSULTANTS RAN THE SHOW
Although Assistant CEO Rick Francis and City Clerk Brenda Green were present,  Consultant Yesenia Arias and her team from Arellano Associates and Demographer David Ely (with arms folded in these photos) provided information and displayed four sample maps - three (3) with five (5) disticts and one with seven (7).  Those were just sample maps to illustrate much of the data Ely had been working with.  Interpreters for Spanish and Vietnamese speakers were provided.  Pay close attention to the slide with the anticipated schedule.  There's not much time to complete this process and get the item ready for the November ballot.

SOME INTERESTING SAMPLE MAPS
I think you'll be able to make out the slides he presented.  You'll probably notice that section 4 on each is the critical link.  That one represents the section with the greatest number of minority (Latino) voters.  I was especially amused to see how, on Sample B, District 3 completely surrounds District 4.  It's an interesting exercise.  Click on the image to enlarge.

 BUILD-YOUR-OWN-DISTRICT EXERCISE
After a break the assembled crowd self-selected into three groups and proceeded to craft their own suggested district maps, using whatever criteria they chose, then explained their reasoning to the rest of the folks in attendance.

THE PRESS WELL-REPRESENTED
Luke Money from the Daily Pilot and Louis Casiano, Jr. from the Orange County Register attended and will write about the event, too.  Look for their stories.  I plan to attend the second meeting Saturday, just to see what kind of crowd turns out.