Senior Commission Tackles Goals In Special Meeting

ONLY FIVE COMMISSIONERS AVAILABLE
A short-handed Costa Mesa Senior Commission (no replacement has been named for departed Stella Adkins and Sue Healey was absent) met before a very small crowd - 8 people eventually showed up to observe and/or speak -  in a special meeting this morning with a single item on the agenda - the establishment of goals and objectives, something Commissioner John McGlinn has been pushing for since the very first meeting of this group a year ago.

OVERLY-OPTIMISTIC AGENDA
Interim Recreation Manager Justin Martin and Senior Center Program Administrator Yvette Aguilar guided the discussion by providing some history and some statistics, but it was clear early-on that some of the commissioners felt the proposal to craft and adopt the goals and objectives at this meeting was overly-optimistic. 

(CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO ENLARGE)

GOOD FLOW OF INFORMATION
Each commissioner had been asked to come prepared to offer suggestions for goals and objectives for their peers to consider, and each of them did.  The discussion was more free-form than past meetings - more like a study session - so the conversations many times overlapped, but in a good, constructive way.  Sometimes it was difficult to tell whether a commissioner was describing a goal or just providing background.  In my opinion, this was - by far - the most productive meeting of this group so far.

KROCHMAN GOT TO THE CORE... WHO DO THEY SERVE?
While each of the commissioners offered good suggestions, the core of the issue this morning revolved around Commissioner Janet Krochman's suggestion that they didn't have enough data to actually accomplish this task - yet.  For example, she suggested that they didn't really know who the Senior Center was supposed to be serving.  She cited the fact that, based on the numbers currently available, they are trying to design programs and services for a very broad age demographic - ages 50 through 100.  The membership at the Senior Center has dropped by 50% since the initial push last year for free membership.  Of those 832 remaining, we don't even know the ages of of 53 (6%) of them.   In fact, the Senior Center is currently providing services and programming for only 2.8% of the Costa Mesa seniors - if you begin to count those ages 50 and older.

COSTLY ACTIVITY
McGlinn at one point observed that it was costing somewhere in the area of $900 per member to provide services - a questionable return on the investment.

WHAT ABOUT THE 50-59 GROUP?
It was generally agreed that it was important to attract more seniors to the center, but some wondered whether there would ever be programming and scheduled hours to attract the largest segment - the 50-59 age group, most of whom are still working and raising families.  At one point it was suggested that the definition of "senior" may need to be amended to exclude that particular group.  This suggestion was serious, since grant funding depends on providing services to a specific percentage of the group to be served.

MCGLINN'S THOUGHTS
McGlinn led off with a series of questions/observations, some of which appeared to morph into "goals".  He suggested, for example, that many times seniors go through a traumatic loss of identity, so some kind of "job training" could be valuable.  He further suggested the following:
1 - Increase the participation of the 55-65 age group.
2 - Expand the hours of operation to accommodate a broader age group.
3 - Explore a different method of access control and use the data collected to further define those being served, and how.
There were other suggestions buried in the discussions.

KIRK'S LIST
Commissioner Kirk Bauermeister provided a clear, concise list of goals:
1 - Increase 2-way communication with Seniors
2 - Increase Senior Center membership by 10%
3 - Expand health and wellness programming by 10%
4 - Increase volunteer opportunities by 10%
5 - Each Costa Mesa high school sponsor an event at the Senior Center next year.

ANN PERRY'S IDEAS
Vice Chair Ann Perry opined that "we're here to serve the seniors, but if some don't need us, that's OK."  She observed that those in their 50's don't see themselves as "seniors".  She suggested that membership sign up sheets should be included inside every issue of The Chronicle.  She suggested greater outreach at venues like the Fish Fry, Concerts in the Park and the Car Show.  She thought there could be transportation to City Council meetings and that City Staffers could make presentations to the seniors on operations within City government.  She also suggested high school groups could do dress rehearsals or abbreviated versions of upcoming productions at the Senior Center. She also suggested more weekend and evening programming be created to serve the younger demographic.

FEENEY - ANOTHER BUS, AND MORE
Chair Ernie Feeney suggested that it would do little good to attract more seniors to the center if we were unable to provide transportation, so she suggested a goal of adding another bus and driver to facilitate better transport.  She further suggested expanding special programming from Friday nights to other evenings of the week.  She suggested mailing The Chronicle to the mailing list of the city Recreation Guide twice a year, to expand the readership and potential membership.  She also mentioned a "volunteer greeter", but it was unclear if that was to be considered a goal or not.  She also suggested an annual survey of all attendees to the Senior Center, using simple "yes or no" questions.

PROGRAM OVERLAP?
Krochman wondered if the programming outlined in the Recreation Guide may overlap some of the Senior programming.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
During Public Comments two people rose to address this issue.

ASHENDORF
Long time activist and volunteer Charlene Ashendorf suggested, using her own, personal experience, that we shouldn't leave the 50-59 group behind - that they can be valuable assets to the center and learn from the more senior members.  She opined that we need to remain relevant in this digital age and the Senior Center should be a one-stop destination for many services.  She suggested that we need to "cultivate the Senior Center" and adhere to the core values.  She also indicated that The Friends Of The Center could be a valuable resource.

HUMPHREY
Former councilman and current candidate Jay Humphrey thanked the commissioners for serving, then observed that the two minutes alloted per person for speaking with such a small group was "preposterous".  He observed that the commission didn't seem to have enough information to make proper decisions yet.  He also suggested folks who declined to return be polled to find out why.  He also suggested a series of "invite a friend" events, where members would be asked to bring a non-member as a method to expand membership.

STAFF WILL COMPILE DATA
The information discussed will be compiled by the staff and presented to the commission, along with answers to their many questions, at their July 12 meeting where this process will continue and - with luck - goals and objectives will be established.

Standing Room Only At Senior Commission Meeting

A PACKED HOUSE 
Today the Costa Mesa Senior Commission held its meeting at the Senior Center before a packed house.  It was a standing room only crowd - all 30 seats were filled, plus a few walkers and wheelchairs were jockeyed around like a Rubik's Cube, and a few younger folks were standing in the back.  At the peak, my count had three dozen audience members in attendance - plus staff and commissioners.

BAUERMEISTER ABSENT
All commissioners were present except Kirk Bauermeister, who began the new school year in a new job with the Newport-Mesa Unified School District.  Chairwoman Ernie Feeney called the meeting to order promptly at 9:00 a.m. and generally stuck to the agenda.

 WEB SITE
When the commission considered the minutes from the last meeting Feeney asked staff about the web site - the internet presence that apparently was hijacked by a member of the former staff who refuses to turn it over to the new, city-run administration.  She was told by Recreation Manager Travis Karlen that the legal department has determined that there is nothing to be done at this time, so the staff is acquiring other domain names and is building a new internet presence for the Senior Center.  This residual pettiness gives those of us who didn't pay much attention to how things ran before a little peek into the previous operations.

SHORTER TRIPS? - THE "GYPSY GROUP"

Three people spoke during Public Comments.  Margie White addressed the question from a prior meeting about the possibility of scheduling shorter trips, but she and her cadre of members who operate the Travel function determined that it is not cost effective.  She deferred to Sharon Margulies, who coordinates the "Gypsy Group", an ad hoc group who coordinates short trips to nearby venues using carpooling and ride-sharing and suggested it might fill in the perceived hole in the activity schedule.  Pauline Eline stepped up to address the departure of the Security Guard and the new one, an older man who, according to Eline, doesn't appear to have the stamina to deal with the homeless folks who wander in.


THE CHRONICLE NAME REMAINS
Old Business #1 was the results of the contest to possibly re-name The Chronicle - the monthly newsletter distributed to members.  The short version of the report was, the staff recommended that the name remain the same based on the results of the survey.  The commission voted to do just that on a unanimous vote.  High praise was given to the staff for the new look of The Chronicle, and for the information provided.

COMPUTER FEES
Old Business #2, the discussion of the fees for Computer Classes.  Senior Center Program Administrator Yvette Aguilar told the commission that the fees matched those of Huntington Beach for the same classes.  No word yet on scholarships for those who cannot afford the classes.  Karlen indicated a more in-depth fee study would be included in the overall Recreation Department Fee Structure that will be presented to City Council.

BUS SCHEDULING
Next up was New Business #1, the issue of Bus Reservations - and the reason most of the people were in the room for this meeting.  Aguilar began a discussion of the staff report and their proposal, which included significant schedule changes.  A "Hot Line" was discussed to provide a dedicated telephone line for folks to address bus issues.  Eleven (11) people made their way to the podium, or found a more convenient microphone, to address this issue.  All of them were very concerned about the modification of the process and what appeared to be the abandonment of the current procedures.  Among the issues were the need for a later bus departure - 3:00 - than was proposed.  Two younger individuals rose to speak about their specific situations - elderly relatives who depend on them to help with their daily activities.  Both described the important part the Senior Center meals/companionship means to them.  Both received applause after speaking.

A CAPACITY ISSUE
Commissioner Janet Krochman addressed the issue by stating that it seems to be a capacity issue.  The senior center now has 1,600 members - four times the number under the previous administration - and the bus capacity remains the same.  Apparently we have two buses - one a 16-person bus with lots of miles on it and the other a 12-person bus with fewer, but still many, miles on it.

DRIVER SCHEDULING
Staff explained one of the problems is the work hours for the bus driver, who must be back at her home base by 4:30 p.m.  A question was asked about two part-time drivers, which could address the late schedule.  The answer was there is no budget for that right now, but the council would have to consider it.

ANCILLARY TRIPS
Concern was expressed by members about losing the capability to be taken to the market or hair dresser.  Aguilar and Commissioner John McGlinn reminded the audience that it is the primary mission of the bus to get members to and from the Senior Center - with side-trips being accommodated only when it doesn't interfere with the primary mission.  Later he told the audience that "You have to take responsibility for yourselves.  The Senior Center is not an ambulatory care center."

NO CHANGE FOR 90 DAYS - STUDY TO COMMENCE
At the end of the discussion McGlinn made a motion, seconded by Krochman, that the current program remain in place as-is for three months, during which the staff will gather data and present a report on the results in January.  Assistant CEO Tammy Letourneau reminded all present that it will be important to funnel ALL concerns/complaints/scheduling issues to the staff - through the "hot line" or directly to Aguilar in the interim - so they have good data on which to base a future recommendation.  The vote was unanimous.  As a note, it was clear that not all complaints were being funneled to the staff.  This will hamper a real analysis of the issue if it continues.

SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC) LEADERSHIP
In her report to the commission Aguilar introduced the new leadership of the Senior Advisory Committee (SAC).  She also spoke of recent successful events and of upcoming events.

NURSE AVAILABILITY ISSUES
She addressed the need for a nurse by indicating that the staff has been in touch with both Hoag and Orange County and were advised that there is a shortage of nurses, but that they continue to work on it.

ALBERT DIXON FOUNDATION DONATIONS
She mentioned that the Albert Dixon Memorial Foundation Board has donated $2,000 to pay for the MELT class that had been unfunded by The City and agreed to donate $15,000 to the Senior Center for the purchase/training on electronic devices - laptops or tablets.  The details are being worked out.  She also mentioned that the Foundation donated $25,000 to Senior Serv to subsidize meal costs for The Senior Center.

MEMBERSHIP QUADRUPLED
Aguilar confirmed that the membership now stands at 1,621, of which 1.098 are Costa Mesa residents.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
During Commissioner Comments McGlinn congratulated the staff on the first anniversary of the new administration - a celebration was to be held this afternoon to mark that milestone.  He observed that things are moving rapidly and seem to be on the right track.

Janet Krochman echoed McGlinn's comment and observed that things don't always move as fast as we wish, but the staff is doing a good job.

Sue Healy thanked the staff.

Stella Adkins observed the anniversary and said it has been a lot of hard work.  The thanked the staff for the recent volunteer dinner and hoped the commissioners would make an effort to attend more of those kind of events.

Anne Perry said she was impressed with the changes in The Chronicle and admired the quality of the product.  She said she's been impressed by the staff and appreciated all their hard work.

Ernie Feeney said the staff work has been outstanding.  She added that she, also, hoped more commissioners would attend events at the Center.  She said everything is going really well and adjourned to the next meeting on November 9, 2015.

EVERYONE IS ADJUSTING
It appears to me that the members of this brand new commission are getting their sea legs and are adapting to the pace of city administration.  It will be interesting to see what kind of a turnout there is for the next meeting.  The January meeting - the one at which the bus issue will again be addressed - will likely have another full house.

Of Money, Transportation, Training and Fraud

SMALL CROWD ATTENDS MEETNG

The Costa Mesa Senior Commission met this morning again and all members were present for the first time.  Unfortunately, it's playing to a diminishing crowd with each meeting.  Today there were eighteen of us in the "crowd" - seventeen ladies and me.  Pretty good odds, don't you think?

FOLLOW ALONG...
I wrote earlier about the agenda, HERE.  If you go there you can follow along with the progress of the meeting.  There are staff reports for each item except the Senior Center Administrator's Report.

  "THE CHRONICAL" NAMING CONTEST
Old Business item 6a, the re-naming contest for The Chronicle, produced several choices.  The commissioners were asked to select from those choices - one per commissioner - which would result in 8 possible names (including the current name, which was the most popular selection in the survey conducted), to be placed on a ballot for Senior Center members to vote on.  This will appear in the next edition of The Chronicle in August and the votes will be tallied and presented to the commission at their next meeting in September.  The names selected by the commissioners were:
Perry - Senior Living
Bauermeister - The New Chronicle
Adkins - The City Of Costa Mesa Senior Center Chronicle
Krochman - The Bulletin
McGlinn - The Senior Chronicle
Healy - The Banner
Feeney - The Senior Chronicle

So, there will be seven (7) selections available on the ballot next month.

ALBERT DIXON FOUNDATION FUNDS
Next came Old Business 6b, the Albert Dixon Funds issue.  Recreation Manager Travis Karlen read the letter from the Albert Dixon Foundation president, Mike Scheafer, which formed part of the agenda packet, which clearly outlined the plan to dissolve the foundation soon and that they, the foundation board, is actively interviewing possible recipients of funds from that organization.

WISH LIST
Sue Healy asked about the "wish list" previously created and wondered about that status.  Karlen told the commission that the information had been provided to the Albert Dixon Board and that he, Karlen, was interested in any other thoughts the commissioners might have.  He also mentioned that the dissolution process will not be a quick process - it would be a matter of months, not weeks.

FEENEY READ FROM MY BLOG
Chairwoman Feeney then leaped into the discussion and began by announcing that a blog in town, which she described as the most read blog, had a comment that she wanted to read.  She was referring to this blog, so thanks for the props, even though she didn't name A Bubbling Cauldron.  She then proceeded to read this segment from my previous entry:
Correspondence from the President of that foundation, Mike Scheafer, makes it clear that his board has no plans to provide any of the funds directly to the Senior Center for any purpose, but is diligently moving forward to find worthy senior-oriented organizations/activities to which it can contribute funds before dissolving the foundation.

INACCURATE IMPLICATION

She implied that I somehow had insider information on how the Albert Dixon Foundation Board plans to distribute the more than $600,000 presently in the coffers.  Of course, my information was taken directly from Scheafer's letter.  Mention was made about the foundation possibly just giving the funds to the Costa Mesa Foundation for distribution.  It's my impression, following a subsequent conversation with Scheafer, that such an action is not their first choice.  The Albert Dixon Foundation Board prefers to have a more direct choice on where those funds go.

NO PUBLIC COMMENTS TAKEN!
It's interesting to note that Feeney DID NOT solicit public comments on this issue - perhaps the most sensitive item on the agenda.  And, although I was sitting right there, she chose NOT to ask me about what I had written.  She just moved on to the next agenda item.  The staff needs to remind her of the need to solicit public comments during the meetings.

NEW INSTRUCTIONAL CLASSES
The next item, New Business 7a, the Instructional Class Proposal, generated more discussion than I expected.  John McGlinn was concerned about the costs, the creation of which was explained by Karlen.  He also explained that the Parks and Recreation Commission was requesting an evaluation of all fees, including those for the Senior Center.  Concerns were expressed by commissioners about the duration of some of the computer classes - 3 hours - citing problems some seniors may have with that duration.  Feeney said, "I don't know about the rest of you, but I have a really weird bladder.  It just wants to do it's own thing." Others also shared her concern for the ability of seniors to focus on a complex subject for three hours at a shot.  As an aside, this meeting lasted nearly two and half hours and only one member of the audience left for a bathroom break, although a couple did doze off from time to time.

SHORTER CLASSES?
Questions were raised about perhaps breaking the class times into smaller bites - one hour, for example.  Staff will investigate that possibility.  Also, staff was asked to investigate the possibility of scholarships for seniors, since some of the costs seemed out of reach of many.  When asked about expanding the class size - a maximum of 6 is presently the limit - we were told there are only 6 computers available.  The commission voted, 7-0, to accept the new schedule and prices.

BUS STUDY - OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE
Next came New Business #7b, the Bus Study, HERE.  Senior Center Program Administrator Yvette Aguilar presented a PowerPoint program which graphically showed that those who participated in a recent survey of bus riders were overwhelmingly satisfied with the service as provided.  Following the presentation Feeney dominated the discussion, which included concerns about the scheduling of the bus and concerns about how the bus driver spends her time when she's not out picking up riders.  Several times during the discussion the driver, Elaine, was praised for her diligence and demeanor.

OLD EQUIPMENT
There were also concerns expressed about the two buses presently in service.  The larger, 16-passenger bus, has 300,000 miles on it so the driver is reluctant to use it from a reliability standpoint.  The other bus, a 12-passenger unit, has "only" 200,000 miles on it, but it apparently is the primary unit used on a daily basis.  When asked about a new bus, Karlen indicated that the fleet is on an established replacement schedule, and that he didn't know where these two buses fell on that schedule, but would inquire.

MICRO-MANAGING
It was interesting that Feeney, instead of simply directing staff to assess the situation and bring back alternatives, tried to micro-manage the issue.  She  read a segment from the staff report that defines the mission of the commission, which she apparently has interpreted to mean that she's supposed to create solutions instead of directing staff to offer alternatives based on their professional assessment.  She emphatically stated several times that the schedule needs to be tightened up - whatever that means.

USING A DISPATCHER?
There was a short discussion about hiring (or using volunteers) to act as a dispatcher for the bus.  Apparently other organizations operate that way.

CHOICES
Member Kirk Bauermeister observed that there is a limited pile of money available and mentioned that in his business (education) they operate with a philosophy of, "You can do anything you want to do, but you can't always do everything you want."  The situation needs to be evaluated and choices made.

WHAT?
Several times Feeney observed that it is the goal of the commission to get as many people to the Senior Center as possible and pointed to the need to "tighten up the schedule".  She may be wanting to run the Senior Transportation operations like public transit.  That, of course, is not possible because of the unpredictability of the scheduling.  And, near the end and although nobody had said that they "can't do" something, she tossed out a motto her husband said appeared on his military barracks wall - "Can't means won't".  Odd...

COMMENTUS INTERRUPTUS
Several people spoke on this issue.  It was hard to keep track because Feeney kept interrupting them before their three minutes had expired.  She needs to "tighten up" her management of the meetings.

AGUILAR'S REPORT
During the Senior Center Program Administrator's Report, Aguilar addressed recent past events, then mentioned upcoming events - the Luau on August 14; Volunteer Training on August 21; Volunteer Appreciation Dinner on August 28 and the as-yet-unscheduled Grandparents Casino Night Out.

SCHEDULE CONFLICTS WILL HAPPEN
During this segment concern was expressed by at least one audience member about being unable to attend events because of scheduling conflicts.  Karlen observed that as the programming at the Senior Center grows those kind of conflicts are going to happen - that folks will simply have to make a choice.

The recruitment for members of the Senior Advisory Committee (SAC) has been extended until July 31 because only 3 applications had been received.

Membership as of July 1 is up to 1,538 members, of which 1,050 are Costa Mesa residents.

Volunteer hours in May and June totaled 842.75 service hours.

Programmed Hours totaled 903.75 in May and 775 in June.

KEEPING TRACK
There were a total of 5,914 "visitors" to the Senior Center during May and 5,677 in June.  That "visitor" number includes duplicated numbers, where each member is counted for each activity attended.  This led to a discussion of how we keep track of folks at the Senior Center.  It was suggested by Member Janet Krochman that some kind of "loyalty card" - similar to those used at markets - might be used and activity tracked using a Cloud-based data base.  Each member would have a card which would be scanned or swiped for entry into the building and for each activity.  It seems like an idea worth investigating.

DEFIBRILLATOR TRAING AND SHORT TRIPS
During member comments member Anne Perry expressed an interest in staff, and possibly members, being trained on Automatic Defibrillator Devices.  She also suggested that perhaps shorter day trips might be considered to venues closer to home - the Segerstrom Center for the Arts, Laguna Beach Arts Festival, etc., to supplement the longer Vegas trips.

THANKS TO STAFF
Bauermeister thanked the staff for their excellent reports and support.

WEB SITE ISSUES - FRAUD?
Stella Adkins expressed concern about the Senior Center web page, HERE.  Apparently members of the staff under the old regime - The Costa Mesa Senior Center Board - have not only refused to turn the website over to The City, but have actually renewed their management arrangement with the service provider.  This is seriously problematic, since there appears to still be an active PayPal account with which solicited funds could be accumulated.  Karlen told me that this is in the hands of the City legal department.  It seems likely that fraud is possible with this site.  If former staffers are withholding this site from The City through vindictiveness, that's one issue.  However, if they are misusing it to gather funds, that's an entirely different and much more serious matter.

A STRATEGIC PLAN - AGAIN
Member McGlinn stood up and, once again, reiterated his opinion that the Senior Commission needs a strategic plan - a road map to follow moving forward.  So far, his idea seems to have fallen on deaf ears.

FIRST FLOOR SEATING
Member Sue Healy introduced herself, spoke about her 29 years with the school district and her volunteer work at the Senior Center for the past couple years.  She expressed the view that there are not enough seating areas on the first floor of the Center.  She suggested that the staff look into that issue.

FURNITURE, WHEELCHAIRS, FIRE DRILL AND A SURVEY
Feeney waived a folded packet of papers around indicating that she'd received a petition from member Edwina Worsham signed by 36 members and that she would talk to Assistant CEO Tammy Letourneau when she returned from medical leave.  She didn't say what it was about, so I asked... seems it also involved furniture.  She also expressed the need for wheelchairs for the Center, citing that there had been many under the old regime that had been donated, including a yellow one used for emergencies.  She also said they needed to have a Fire Drill ASAP, since there had not been one for a year and a half.  She also expressed the need for a Community Survey of seniors to determine what they want from a Senior Center.  She said the prior regime refused to do one.

ON FEENEY...
An observation...  The Senior Commission is made up of some good folks, with lots to offer the seniors of this community.  They are still getting their "sea legs", and will likely be an effective unit as the months pass.  It seems to me that meeting every other month is not frequently enough to maintain momentum on important issues.  Also, Chairwoman Feeney needs some guidance on her role.  She acts as though someone anointed her queen, instead of the chair of the commission.  She needs to understand that there's a difference between a discussion and demands.  She needs to permit speakers their full three minutes without interruption.  Presently she turns the speaker time into a chat session, taking a page out of Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer's playbook.  I don't think it's malicious on her part, but she needs to "tighten up" her game.  She needs to run the meeting following the rules established, not like a coffee klatch.  She needs to help her fellow commissioners arrive at the direction they want to give staff, not just unilaterally demand from the staff certain actions.

Old Guard Leads New Senior Commission

BABY STEPS FOR THE NEW COMMISSION

At the first meeting of the brand new Costa Mesa Senior Commission this morning, two long time Senior Center activists were selected by their peers to head the commission.  Ernie Feeney was elected as Chair of the commission and Stella Adkins was chosen as Vice-Chair.

 

Chair Ernie Feeney

Vice Chair Stella Adkins

INTERESTING LEADERSHIP CHOICES
Without judging these choices, I will tell you that I found myself intrigued that none of the other three commissioners, Janet Lee Krochman, Kirk Bauermeister and John McGlinn - each of whom has very significant leadership experience in their backgrounds - were even nominated.  It's going to be very interesting to see how this shakes out, particularly since the commission now MUST be guided by the Brown Act rules of decorum.  Experience in the management of complicated programs and processes would certainly have been helpful.  We'll see...

 Member Janet Lee Krochman

 Member Dr. Kirk Bauermeister

 Member John McGlinn

THE SWEARING-IN
City Clerk Brenda Green swore-in the five members of the commission - which will probably end up being seven by the time the next meeting rolls around in May, then Feeney and Adkins were elected.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Two members of the public spoke during the Public Comment segment of the meeting.  Sue Healy expressed concern about the availability of the Albert Dixon Foundation funds for senior programs.   Corrine Stover spoke about the sense of "belonging", and mentioned the Senior Roundtable.

BROWN ACT CLIFF NOTES
Recreation Manager Travis Karlen gave a thumbnail presentation on The Brown Act, discussing the complications of a quorum being accidentally formed if three or more of the commissioners show up at the same event.  If that's the case, only two may speak on the issue, otherwise the Brown Act is violated.  He also explained that, while the public may address an issue NOT on the published agenda during Public Comments, the commission may NOT vote or debate the issue.  It must be officially placed on the agenda of a future meeting.  He explained that all meetings must be officially posted 72 hours in advance.  He also emphasized that NO member may speak "on behalf" of the commission - EVER!

POTENTIAL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The Commission agreed to agendize a discussion of the Senior Serv program for a future meeting.  They also agreed that a discussion of the Senior Advisory Committee should take place next time, to lay out the ground rules for the relationship between the Commission and that Committee.  There was also a discussion of  the Senior Roundtable, which was described as a long-standing "discussion group", where folks gather to chat about issues, sometimes over a meal.

THE ORGANIZATION
Karlen gave a short PowerPoint presentation (now available for viewing online HERE) on the organization structure so folks would know where the Senior Commission fell in that organization, and the relationship of the Recreation staff that operates the Senior Center. (click on the image to enlarge)

 Organization

 Staff

NEW SENIOR CENTER BOSS
He also introduced Yvette Aguilar, Senior Center and Program Administrator, who is on her second day on the job.  She reports to Karlen and will be in charge of all operations, programs and staff at the Senior Center.

Yvette Aguilar

THE ALBERT DIXON FOUNDATION
During his report to the Commission Karlen discussed the Albert Dixon Foundation.  He reminded us that the City CANNOT accept funds from the Foundation, so he's been in touch with the Costa Mesa Foundation, which may act as a conduit for funds requested from the Albert Dixon Foundation.  He has apparently spoken with Mike Scheafer, the President of the Albert Dixon Foundation Board, who wants to work with The City to find a way to fund Senior Programs in the City.  A brief discussion of that process - something the Commission will have to flesh out in the future, took place.  Apparently, seniors seeking funding for a program from the Albert Dixon Foundation will have to have that issue vetted by City Staff, then approved for request by the Commission.  This seems to be a cumbersome process, particularly since the Commission only meets every other month.  It will take some baby steps in this process to see how it's actually going to work.  And, Feeney wanted to know exactly how much money is left in the Foundation coffers.  Karlen did not have that number immediately available.

FEENEY'S CONCERNS
During Commissioner Comments, most had very little left to talk about, having discussed specific issues during the meeting.  Feeney was the exception, as she presented a laundry list of issues.

• She was concerned that, after six months since the hand-off from the previous corporation, the same old telephone greeting was still on the system.  It turns out that the old Senior Corporation has, for some reason, refused to provide a code to enable the new organization to modify the message until the entirely new phone system is installed.  
• She asked Karlen for a hard-copy of his Power Point presentation.
• She wondered about how The Chronicle - the monthly Senior Center newsletter - is being distributed, and could additional copies be produced and place in doctors offices, etc.
• She was concerned that Senior Center employees don't yet have extension numbers.
• And, finally, she expressed concern that the Bus Driver was driving on the Freeway, which she says upsets some members.

The meeting was adjourned to the next one on May 12th at 9:00 a.m.

MY THOUGHTS
A few thoughts about this meeting.

• I'm glad I attended this first meeting and expect to attend others in the future.
• There were only 13 members of the public in the audience - a much smaller group than was hoped-for.
• This is going to be a BIG adjustment for members of the Commission and members of the Senior Center.  The process required to be followed as a City Commission will sometimes seem like watching sap run and I wonder if some of the folks will have the patience necessary to work within this process.
• It's going to be interesting to see how the interrelationship of the Commission, the Senior Advisory Committee and the Roundtable are blended.  I have my fingers crossed for that process.
• It's going to be a real test for the City Staff, headed up by Assistant CEO Tammy Letourneau and Karlen, to provide sufficient direction for the Commission to keep it from running amok.
• It's going to be VERY interesting to see how the coordination of the Senior Commission, the Albert Dixon Foundation Board and the Costa Mesa Foundation shakes out.

*****

SCHOOL BOARD MEETING TONIGHT
Steve Smith wanted me to remind you all that there is a meeting of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District Board of Trustees at 6:00 p.m. at District Headquarters, 2985 Bear Street, Costa Mesa, 92626.  He's got a burr under his blanket about what he feels is inappropriate spending and hopes folks will turn out for the meeting.  You can read his latest blog entry on it HERE.