Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Parks & Rec. Commission Tackles Meaty Issues

SOME HEAVY STUFF ON THE AGENDA
Chairman Brett Eckles and the Costa Mesa Parks and Recreation Commission meets again on Thursday, July 28, 2016 beginning at 6:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers and will deal with some pretty meaty issues.  You can read the full agenda HERE.

NEW ICE SKATING-RELATED CLASSES

On the Consent Calendar there is one item, HERE, in which the commission will be asked to consider and approve eight (8) new Instructional Class Proposals, all of them ice skating-oriented.


FUAP REPORT
There is no Old Business on the agenda, but there are two New Business issues for the commission to consider.  The first is the Spring 2016 Field Audit Report and Amendments to the Existing Field Use and Allocation Policy, HERE.  This one could include some dicey discussion.  It seems that all user groups met the requirements of the program - except one, Newport Mesa Friday Night Lights (NMFNL).  That group reported less than half the required local residency requirement.  That will relegate them to a Group 5 status and severely limit their opportunities to use fields covered by the plan.  Extensive documentation, including graphics, are included in the staff report.

CODE OF CONDUCT ADDED
Also included is the staff recommendation for inclusion of a Field Use Code of Conduct in the FUAP.

TALBERT PARK RESTORATION
New Business #2, HERE, is a review of the Talbert Regional Park Final Habitat Restoration Plan.  The staff recommends that the City partner with OC Parks to search and apply for grants and other funding opportunities and recommends the implementation of Alternative 1 with select elements of Alternates 2 and 3.  The staff report is comprehensive - long, for you slow readers - and will require the commissioners to pay attention and do their homework on this issue.

WILL JULIE SHOW UP AND HAVE DONE HER HOMEWORK?
It's the middle of summer, so I wonder how many commissioners will attend this meeting.  I'm particularly interested to see if rookie Commissioner Julie Mercurio shows up, since she bowed-out of the City Council race last week and the apparent sole purpose of appointing her to this commission was to give her visibility for that race.  And, I wonder if she will actually do the heavy lifting required to understand and make an informed decisions on both the New Business items listed above.  I guess we'll see tomorrow night.


Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Another City Council Marathon Anticipated Tuesday

 MARATHON DOUBLE-HEADER
Remember when I told you that the Planning Commission meeting Monday was going to be a biggie, HERE?  Well, it looks like we're in for one heck of a double-header this week!

LONG AND MEMORABLE
The next, Tuesday, March 15, 2016, the Costa Mesa City Council will meet for the second time this month beginning at 5:45 p.m. in City Council Chambers at City Hall in what is likely to be a very long and memorable meeting, chock full of interesting and controversial issues.  Read the full agenda HERE.

FOUR LITIGATION ITEMS IN CLOSED SESSION
As you view that agenda, right off the bat you'll notice something different.  The meeting will be preceded by a longer-than-usual Closed Session beginning at 4:30 in which the council will discuss four (4) litigation items!  Yes, sir, the hits just keep on coming.  Through January, 2016 the total legal fees for this fiscal year were $1.3 million.  For the entire last fiscal year they were $2.15 million, so we're well ahead of the pace from last year.  Discussing litigation will almost certainly put them in a good mood for the remainder of the meeting - NOT!

 HONORING DR. B
Apparently Dr. Kirk Bauermeister will be presented with the most recent Mayor's Award Tuesday.  He's a terrific community asset.

WILL RIGHEIMER LOSE IT - AGAIN?
Public Comments - sometimes the most interesting part of the meeting comes next.  It will be interesting to see if any comments provoke Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer to lose his temper - again - and see him launch off on a tirade.  That alone is worth the price of admission.

WILL GARY SPEAK - AGAIN?
Next comes Council Member Comments - you just never know what will happen in this segment.  Last time around Gary Monahan actually had something to say for a change.

WILL HATCH BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK?
Then comes the CEO Report - that is, if Mayor Steve Mensinger will actually let CEO Tom Hatch report anything.

NINE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR
Next up is the Consent Calendar, which has nine (9) items on it and at least a couple cry out for separate discussion and vote.  These items are considered "routine" and could all be voted on in one vote.  You will recall that if a member of the council, staff or public does pull an item for discussion, it will be trailed to the very end of the meeting - sometimes that means that interested parties may have to hang around until after midnight.  Few do.

THE WARRANT
So, let's take the Consent Calendar from the top.  I'll only comment on those item I think may get pulled, or that hold special interest.  First comes Item #2, Warrant 2553, HERE.  As has been my practice in the past, I'll list a few items that caught my eye as I scroll down through the list.
  • Clean Sweet - $57,299.98 - Street Sweeping Svcs, Jan 16
  • G4S Secure Solutions, Inc. - $52,621.50 - Jail Facilities Svcs, Jan 2015 (I suspect that's 2016)
  • Jones & Mayer - $130,361.62 - Legal Svcs, various
  • Moore Iacofano Goltsman Inc. - $50,630.00 - GP Update & Environmental Report
  • RJM Design Group Inc. - $25,851.00 - Open Space Master Plan Update
  • Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. - $7,764.07 - Pavement Mgnt Prog.
  • Endemic Enviromental Services, Inc. - $8,250.00 - Fairview Park Biological Montrng - Jan 16
  • Larry's Bulding Materials - $7,935.84 - Sandbags
  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore - $11,967.20 - Legal Svcs, various
  • Orange County Humane Society - $6,250.00 - Kennel Fees Jan. 2016
  • Johnson Favaro LLP - $75,303.82 - Library/NCC Pkng Lot Imprv
  • Glenn Lukos & Assoc. - $2,094.09 - Fairview Park Biological Services
  • Interwest Consulting Group - $14,422.50 - Sr. Bldg Inspctr, Dec 15
  • Keyser Marston Assoc. - $5,549.00 - Neighborhood Improv/Homeless Jan 16
  • Liebert Cassity Whitmore - $5,135.00 - Legal, various
  • REFS Inc. - $10,180.30 - Foreclosure services
  • Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth - $13,770.07 - Legal Svcs various
You will note that we spent more than $160,000 on legal fees on this warrant.  Gee, what a surprise!

FIELD USE AUDIT REPORT AND AMENDMENTS TO THE FUAP
Item #4, HERE, is the 2015 Fall Field Audit Report and Amendments to the existing field use and allocation policy.  Under normal circumstances I guess I understand why this on is on the Consent Calendar except this is a hot-button item and, having read the staff report, leaves me with a big question.  Four organizations have not met the residency standard for their groups so apparently will not have fields assigned for the fall.  However, part of the staff recommendation is to loosen up the residency requirements for Group 6, and three of those four would now qualify.  It's not clear if that has been taken into consideration for them.

CIRCULATOR GRANT
Item #5, HERE,  is a resolution for an application for a Community Based Transit Circulator Program Grant.  Using Measure M2 funds, if successful in getting the grant Costa Mesa could receive up to $600,000 for planning and operation of a "circulator" system.  See the attachment, HERE, that defines the project, which involves a transit system serving the Lab/Camp area.

See the staff report for the remainder of the Consent Calendar items.

COIN HEARING ON CMPA CONTRACT - FINALLY!
Public Hearing #1, HERE, is the required first public hearing under the COIN ordinance prior to the adoption of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Costa Mesa and the Costa Mesa Police Association (CMPA).  The details of the agreement, already ratified by the CMPA are included in the staff report.  The second public hearing will be held at the council meeting on April 19, 2016.  Keep in mind, the CMPA has been working without a new contract for more than 600 days.  Changes included involve the term of the contract; CalPERS Cost Sharing; CalPERS Retirement Contribution; Wage Increase; Vacation Leave and Sick Leave.  Total fiscal impact through the expiration of the contract in 2018 is $1,837,682.  See the staff report for the details.  And, yes, Mensinger and Righeimer will have to step out of the room for this item because of their ongoing bogus lawsuit against the men and women of the CMPA.
APPEAL OF DENIAL OF RELIGIOUS/CULTURAL CENTER
Public Hearing #2, HERE, is the appeal of the Planning Commissions denial of a zoning application for a religious and cultural center near John Wayne Airport.  The staff report and numerous attachments are voluminous and, since this is a "de novo" hearing - meaning everything starts all over - it could be a long one.  The Planning Commission hearing was a long process.

COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
New Business #1, HERE, is appointments to various committees.  Currently six (6) committees have vacancies, either permanent or alternate.  forty-five (45) applicants responded to the recruitment in January and February.  They are as follows:
  • Bikeway and Walkability Committee - 3 positions, 8 applicants
  • Cultural Arts Committee - 4 positions, 10 applicants
  • Finance Advisory Committee - 9 positions 10 applicants
  • Historical Preservation Committee - 7 positions, 7 applicants
  • Housing and Public Service Grant Committee - 4 positions, 6 applicants
  • Pension Oversight Committee - 1 position, 4 applicants  
See the staff report and attachments for details of each committee and backgrounds of the applicants.
ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
New Business #2, HERE, is Animal Shelter Services.  The staff recommends that the city maintain animal care sheltering services with the current provider, Orange County Humane Society.  This organization has been under fire by the City of Newport Beach and more than a few Costa Mesa residents.  The discussion on this issue is going to be VERY interesting.


SMART GROWTH INITIATIVE
 New Business #3, HERE,  is also going to be VERY interesting.  This is the so-called Smart Growth Initiative, sponsored by the group Costa Mesa First, and which has received sufficient signatures which have been certified by the Registrar of Voters to be placed on the November, 2016 General Election ballot.   As required by State Law, the staff recommends the City Council do the following:

DO THIS...
Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency issued by the County of Orange Registrar of Voters regarding, "An Initiative To Require Voter Approval On Certain Development Projects".

...AND ONE OF THESE
Further, it will be recommended that the City Council approve one of the following options:
1 - Adopt the ordinance, without alteration, or within 10 days after it is presented; OR
2 - Order placement of the measure on the November 8, 2016 consolidated municipal election; OR
3 - Order a report pursuant to Election Code (EC) paragraph 9212.

NO SNOW IN HELL, SO...
Since the weather report for hades does not report snow, we assume the council will choose the latter and the Elections Code specifies the report can be anything the City Council requests, including, but not limited to:

1. Its fiscal impact; and/or

2. Its effect on the internal consistency of the city's general and specific plans, including the housing element, the consistency between planning and zoning, and the limitations on city actions under Section 65008 of the Government Code and Chapters 4.2 (commencing with Section 65913) and 4.3 (commencing with Section 65915) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code; and/or

3. Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of housing, and the ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs; and/or

4. Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types, including, but not limited to, transportation, schools, parks, and open space. The report may also discuss whether the measure would be likely to result in increased infrastructure costs or savings, including the costs of infrastructure maintenance, to current residents and businesses; and/or

5. Its impact on the community's ability to attract and retain business and employment; and/or

6. Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land; and/or

7. Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing business districts, and developed areas designated for revitalization; and or 8. Any other matters that the legislative body wishes to be considered in the report.

CONSULTANT ALREADY RETAINED
And, we presume that, even though the City Council has NOT heard the item yet and NO official decision has been made, somebody decided to get cracking on the report because the staff report tells us that CEO Hatch has already retained a consultant, Keyser Marston Associates, for an estimated $15,000 to perform the analysis to help with the report.  The report is required by law to be back before the City Council within 30 days, so it will be presented at the council meeting of April 5, 2016, at which time the council will either adopt it within 10 days or authorize placement on the November 8, 2016 ballot.

WHO WILL WASTE TIME DISCUSSING THE INITIATIVE?
This should be very interesting.  I find myself wondering who will stray off the reservation and critize the issue itself, which will be a HUGE waste of time, since WHETHER it goes on the ballot or not is NOT up for discussion - it WILL be either adopted by the council or placed on the ballot without alteration.  Let's see who does the grandstanding on this issue.

LIGHTING AND TURF FOR THREE SCHOOLS?
Next up will be New Business #4, HERE, a feasibility study by Councilman Gary Monahan for lighting and synthetic turf at at Kaiser Elementary, Davis Middle School and Parsons School.  $200,000 has been allocated in the current budget for this activity and $45,000 is being requested to come from that account to be delivered to the Newport Mesa Unified School District to commence the study.

LIVESCAN FOR APPOINTEES?
The final item on the agenda, New Business #5, HERE, is requested by Councilwoman Katrina Foley, asking for council approval of a condition to require current and future City Council appointees to the City's commissions and committees to submit to a fingerprinting procedure, via LiveScan screening, prior to them taking their respective positions.

ANOTHER MARATHON...
And that - certainly very late in the evening or early morning - will be that.  It will be another meeting where bringing a pillow and packing a lunch is advised.



Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Field Use And Fairview Park Top Parks Commission Agenda

 FIRST MEETING OF THE YEAR
The Costa Mesa Parks and Recreation Commission meets for the first time this year on Thursday, January 28, 2016 beginning at 6:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers at City Hall.  The agenda for the meeting may be found HERE.

TREE REMOVAL
There is one tree removal request, HERE, for a pretty nice looking Canary Island Pine tree at 2743 Gannett Drive.  The staff recommends denial, but the commission could authorize the removal.

FIELD USE AND ALLOCATION POLICY AND AUDIT REPORT
Next up on the agenda is the 2015 Fall Field Audit Report and proposed amendments to the Field Use And Allocation Policy (FUAP).  You can read that agenda item and the report HERE.  This could be a very interesting discussion.  As a result of the audit several adult groups were bounced from the fall schedule and youth group Friday Night Lights failed to meet the membership standards, too.  I suspect we'll see representatives of many of these groups in the audience to discuss the changes being proposed.

FAIRVIEW PARK ANNUAL REPORT
The final item on the formal program is the Fairview Park Annual Report, HERE.  I won't try to cover everything on the report - it's an easy staff report to go through.  Most Fairview Park lovers will find it of great interest.  I find myself wondering if the initiative to protect Fairview Park from development for which petitions are currently being circulated will get any discussion during this meeting.  We'll see.


Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Five Sports Leagues Lose Field Priorities

FOLLOW THE RULES, OR...
Today the City of Costa Mesa announced that four adult and one youth sports league will have limited access to Costa Mesa fields beginning in the fall of 2016 after they failed to meet the city's new local residential participation guidelines.  Those groups are:
  • Newport-Mesa Friday Night Lights Flag Football (youth)
  • Newport Beach Women Soccer
  • Word Athletic Kickball Association
  • International Soccer League
  • Surf and Sun Softball
RESIDENCY QUESTIONS
According to the press release, the City Council adopted a new Field Use and Allocation Policy (FUAP) last July to provide a clear and concise set of rules and regulations regarding field usage.  As those who have followed this issue know, many youth sports leagues have long-bemoaned what they perceived as a severe shortage in playing fields in our city.

AUDITS
As part of the process for the new FUAP the City conducted an audit of the sports leagues.  Apparently the paperwork submitted by these five sports leagues failed to meet the guidelines set forth by the new FUAP.  Inconsistencies involved residency issues and the percentage of the league participants that met the requirements of the FUAP.

COSTA MESA KIDS FIRST!
According to Travis Karlen, Manager of Parks and Community Services, "The policy was created to ensure that Costa Mesa residents and children who play in recreational programs are at the top of the list when it comes to who gets to use our fields and resources."

TIME TO FIND OPTIONS
The field use changes become effective next fall, so the groups have sufficient time to find other options.  According to Karlen, "We are letting these groups know they are out of compliance now so that they have enough time to look for other fields for their participants to use."

TIME EXTENSION
The City extended the deadline for two months to provide more time for the leagues to meet the requirements.  They didn't...

ENFORCEMENT AND AUDITS WILL CONTINUE
City staff and ambassadors will continue to enforce the Field Use and Allocation Policy and audits during the spring 2016 season and in subsequent seasons.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

FUAP (And Leinart) Passed - Painfully

WHAT, AGAIN?
Remember that Parks and Recreation Commission meeting the last week of June in which the new Field Use And Allocation Policy (FUAP) was discussed in what could only be described as a confused and disjointed event?  I wrote about it HERE.  Well, the Costa Mesa City Council did them one better (worse?) last night as the same issue came before them for ratification/enhancement.  The former happened, but I'm not so sure about the latter.  More on that in a minute.

VECTOR CONTROL ISSUE PULLED
The final item on the agenda - the appointment of Planning Commissioner Stephan Andranian to the Vector Control District - had been pulled.  We're not sure why, but later councilwoman Sandra Genis spoke about it, and the fact that she had been the alternate, but that nobody spoke with her about taking over for Gary Monahan.  As it turned out, Monahan apparently missed more meetings than he attended, but didn't alert anyone about it, so Costa Mesa had no representation on that board for several months.  I'm not surprised - he has showed up late or not at all to several meetings this year.

FROM THE TOP
But now, taking it from the top, the meeting began promptly at 5:45 with both councilman Gary Monahan and councilwoman Katrina Foley absent.  Monahan showed up fifteen minutes later and Foley made it by 6:30.

MAYOR'S AWARD
Mayor Steve Mensinger presented the Mayor's Award to Project Independence - a nice and fitting recognition for an excellent organization.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Fourteen people spoke during Public Comments - which was NOT bifurcated again.  Mensinger has tried to keep all the speakers up front for the past few meetings, which is always a good idea.  Many of those speaking addressed Fireworks, with a couple speaking favorably and others very critical of this year's event.  Among those speaking against Fireworks was Flo Martin - long time resident who was in town for this year's Independence Day holiday.  She told the council that the Zero Tolerance policy was a joke, and gave an example of one of her neighbors only receiving a warning when shooting off fireworks earlier than the prescribed time - a warning which he promptly ignored.

Chuck Perry was one of the two speakers who praised the Fireworks and speculated that the various groups selling them made $250,000.  He also praised the council majority for ongoing street repairs.

Cindy Black wore a "Save The Banning Ranch" t-shirt and spoke briefly on that issue before taking on the costs and performance of Cognify - the vendor who installed the abysmal CAD-RMS system that is still not performing and to whom we paid significantly higher charges than bid.  Did we mention that the honcho of that company is a campaign supporter of Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer?

Robin Leffler criticized the recent budget, describing it as a "spendthrift budget", which was presented as a balanced budget but used significant amounts of reserves to achieve that level.

Jay Humphrey brought up the Orange County Register article on
the City of Tustin's recent wrestling with density issues, and compared them to Costa Mesa.
Mary Spadoni criticized the CAD RMS system, suggesting "the people" have a right to know what's
going on crime-wise in the city.  She then rattled off some recent crime statistics which showed dramatic increases in so-called Part 2 crimes.  She blamed it directly on the staff shortage and the inability to enforce our laws.
Beth Refakes reminded all that the Military Affairs Team continues to collect gowns for the 1/5 Marines upcoming pre-deployment ball at Camp Pendleton.  She also addressed the fireworks, which she described as a war zone.
Ann Parker discussed crime and mentioned that she'd seen a recent article which ranked California cities over 100,000 people from a crime standpoint.  The higher a city is on the list, the worse their crime situation.  Number 1 was Oakland.  Number 3 was Compton and snuggled between them - at Number 2 - was Costa Mesa.  Certainly, this is NOT a list you want to appear on...

Cindy Brenneman thanked staffers Dan Baker and Kelly Shelton for their support of the First Friday Road Show and mentioned the most recent one, on July 3rd.
Tamar Goldmann observed all the plaudits for new Police Chief Rob Sharpnack, and the praise he was receiving as a "home grown" product.  She spoke about all the various opportunities he had with the CMPD during his 20 year career, then wondered if new officers would have similar opportunities now that the staff is diminished and specialty units are depleted, providing fewer opportunities to broaden a career without leaving the department.  She suggested that the council was not doing it's job with a new contract for the CMPD, which has been working without a contract for more than a year.

MONAHAN
During Council Comments Monahan discussed the PD negotiations, mentioned the difficulty scheduling all parties for negotiations and said that to state they were not doing their job was a "Bold Faced Lie".  Nice.  Of course, he's been busy pulling beer taps and playing softball - much more important than doing the job the people hired him to do.

RIGHEIMER
Righeimer observed that people had called him to tell him that this year's July 4th celebrations were better, and mentioned that 10 Orange County cities sold fireworks this year.  He said we have to clamp down on the illegal fireworks or we could lose it all.  He said it's OK to turn in your neighbor.

He disputed the claims by a speaker that the budget was faulty - implying that she didn't know what she was talking about.  He said, "You just don't understand it."

He spoke about crime, blamed AB 109 for the increase, indicating that criminals were being released and they didn't have jobs and they have to eat, so they commit crimes.  He, once again, dredged up his old phrase, "Crime is caused by the people who live in our city."  He went on to blame motels, and cited an upcoming General Plan amendment that will slap an overlay on certain motels to "help them" decide if they want to stay in that business.  This is not the first time he's issued that not-very-veiled threat to businesses in this city.  Of course, he likely has developer-buddies salivating over the opportunity to snatch some of those prime pieces of property at bargain basement prices.

MENSINGER
Mensinger spoke about a variety of things, including the fact that Director of Public Services Ernesto Munoz will be joining him on Sunday for his latest "Meet The Mayor" event from 2-4 p.m. at City Hall.  I'm sure Munoz - who already attends practically every late night meeting in the city - will really enjoy blowing off his entire Sunday with the Mayor and another campaign photo opp.

Mensinger also mentioned his "Walk with the Mayor event this Friday and said it will be his 322nd walk.  He also told us of a "private" version of the old Neighbors-to-Neighbors rehab event on 7/18 where two homes will receive freshening.

He spoke about the Fireworks in glowing terms and, at one time, said, "I haven't met anyone that doesn't like fireworks."  (Geez, right on cue at 2:18 Wednesday morning as I type this, another M80 was fired off in my neighborhood!  Perfect!)  Anyhow, when he said that I was waiving my arms in the back row and pointing to myself, because he HAS met me and I DON'T like fireworks.  Oh, well.

He then praised new Chief Sharpnack for his rapid replies to emails.  OK, but let's get those crime stats down, first.

FOLEY
Katrina Foley addressed the negotiations, indicating that they were making very deliberate progress - that they were not close yet, but getting there.

She also reiterated her request from CEO Tom Hatch for a report about the July 4th Fireworks sales.  She wants to know how much money each booth made, and how much each vendor made and she also wanted to know how much booths may have lost due to counterfeit bills being passed.

She discussed her request for  a review of the Westside Overlays and requested a joint study session with the Planning Commission to discuss it.

She also discussed the motel issues, observing that putting pressure on the motels would result in higher density dwelling units being built on those sites.

And, she reminded folks that if they're going to the Orange County Fair they might wish to park at Costa Mesa High School and provide financial support to youth groups at the same time.

GENIS
Sandra Genis addressed the Fireworks and the stress on pets.  She suggested that next year consideration be given to waiving pound fees for those recovering pets who ran during the July 4th event.  She also mentioned the Vector Control issue.

HATCH
Hatch, during his comments, told us that the City had recently received two awards for excellence in municipal issues by the Association of California Cities Orange County.  One was for our Small Lot Ordinance and the other was for Police activities at South Coast Plaza.  Kudos.

Three items were pulled from the Consent Calendar and were trailed to the end of the meeting.

COIN AND RUDE RIGHEIMER
Public Hearing #1 was the second reading of the amendment to the contract with the Costa Mesa City Employees Association (CMCEA).  Foley asked if, because the county COIN ordinance is now invalid, does it affect us?  Laura Kalty of the law firm handling our negotiations will provide a report.  Jay Humphrey was the only speaker to address this, and observed that the public would also like to know the results of that report.  Righeimer retorted, "You don't know what you're talking about.", to Humphrey - a former council member and regular observer of municipal affairs - then proceeded to chide him about the issue.  Sadly, it was not the most rude behavior we've seen from Righeimer - but close.  The issue passed on a surprising 4-1 vote.  Monahan voted NO.

QUICKEST VOTE
Old Business #1, which dealt with expedited processing for residential rooftop solar installations which is required by the state, took only 30 seconds to deal with on a 5-0 vote.

SHODDY STAFF WORK?
Old Business #2, which was a clean-up of an ordinance dealing with Group Homes, also didn't take long.  Ann Parker spoke to the issue, observing that it was pretty shoddy staff work that required this change.  It passed, 5-0.

DON'T BLINK
New Business #1, the exception to the waiting period to rehire a retired employee, took three minutes, flat and passed on a 5-0 vote.

CLOSING HOLES IN THE WALLS
New Business #2, the issue of closing pedestrian openings from cul de sacs bordering Victoria Street, took 30 minutes but passed on a 5-0 vote.

FUAP AND LEINART CENTER STAGE
That brought us to the big event of the evening, New Business #3, the consideration of the new Field Use and Allocation Policy (FUAP) and consideration of certain status for some user groups.  This one DID NOT go quietly into the night.  In fact, watching this process must be kind of like trying to pass a kidney stone.... painful.

CHAOS PREVAILED
The discussion, which Mensinger failed to control, was all over the place, with micro-managing of phrases and practically reinventing the wheel.  Of course, the Matt Leinart Flag Football issue was a core part of the discussion and it took some interesting twists.  For example, one of the exhibits in the staff report - added at the last minute - described a repayment schedule of dollars the Leinart organization owed the city for being given fields at an improper cost based on information they provided last year.  Foley suggested that money be passed through and split between athletic programs at both Estancia and Costa Mesa High Schools, to be used for equipment.  That later was NOT acted upon because it was not on the agenda.

ALBERS REPRESENTED LEINART...
The discussion went on and on for 45 minutes before Public Comments began.  Nine people spoke, most of whom commended the staff for the good job they had done on the new policy.  Leece was critical of the appearance of rewarding groups for wrong-doing - the Leinart organization and Friday Night Lights.  Once again, Frank Albers spoke in favor of the Leinart designation as a Group 3 user, although this time he didn't really make it clear that he was actually an official spokesman for the group.  Nobody else from the Leinart organization was in the room - again. Very curious, to say the least.

TRUST BUT VERIFY
One thread that persisted through the discussions was Righeimer's demand that we have a way to positively verify the eligibility of individual players to meet the requirements of participation.  That discussion took on a life of it's own several times.  At one point Foley suggested we just let the School District verify the names.  Monahan pulled that one up short, citing the massive amount of work that would entail.  At the end, it was left to the staff to demand the ability to audit the records anytime to determine proper classification.

LEINART EXTENDED, ALMOST AS AN AFTER THOUGHT
It was just a couple ticks of the clock short of two hours on this issue when Righeimer began making motions to codify the many, many changes to the policy that the council agreed upon during their discussions.  At 9:52 they voted to grant permanent Group 1 user status to three organizations - AYSO 97; Newport Harbor Baseball Association and Newport Mesa Girls Softball.  That vote included granting a one year extension of Group 3 status to Matt Leinart Flag Football.  Checked the tape.. Righeimer's motion DID NOT include Leinart.  He said the change to Group 3 rules would take care of Leinart.

CHA-CHA-CHANGES!
Then began what can only be described as rapid fire motions, all happening so fast - with members speaking over each other - that it was virtually impossible to keep up with them.  It was like watching a Rugby scrum.  The first, made by Righeimer, was by far the most important.  It replaced the references to "Costa Mesa residents" with "Local residents" and defined it as follows: Local residents are defined as players that live inside the Newport Mesa School District boundaries or go to public or private schools inside those boundaries."  That, combined with a couple other motions, seems to have opened up Costa Mesa fields to youth groups from Corona del Mar and the Sage Hill High School.

Changes were also made in the percentage of "local residents" as defined above required for Group 3 status - 90%.  Group 6 - adult teams - were given a minimum number of "local residents" to be maintained - 25% - and it will include those who work in the city.

Other changes were also made, but my head was spinning at that time.  Watch the tape near the end to try to catch them all.

DISAPPOINTMENT
At the end of that process Genis expressed extreme disappointment in the behavior of some of the groups - organizations that were supposed to be providing positive role models for the kids, yet apparently attempted to game the system, as Parks and Recreation Commissioner Byron de Arakal had put it at their meeting.  It was because of that lack of confidence in some of the group leaders that such a big deal was made about verifying eligibility - and understandably so.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ALL PASSED
The three Consent Calendar items were heard.  Robin Leffler pulled #6 and suggested that we pause and take a look at the impact of developments completed and currently underway before proceeding with others.  Sandra Genis pulled #8, the storm drain at the end of Pacific Avenue at Fairview Park.  Flo Martin pulled #12, the Mercy House  housing issue, and said Costa Mesa needs transitional housing for homeless people.  All passed on 5-0 votes and we left the chambers at 10:20 p.m., missing my mark by almost an hour.  Darn!

BIKEWAYS AND WALKABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday - today - is the next meeting of the Bikeways and Walkability Committee, at 6:30 in Conference Room 1A at City Hall.  HERE is the agenda for that meeting.  See you there.

Labels: , , , , , , ,