Wednesday, May 04, 2016

Righeimer's Bond Scheme Fails And More

EXPECTING ANOTHER RIOT?
The Costa Mesa, apparently expecting big trouble because there were four (4) officers in the auditorium plus Chief Rob Sharpnack, made it through the meeting without incident.  Maybe it was because I watched the proceedings at home..

MAYOR'S AWARD
Mayor Steve Mensinger opened things up with a presentation of his Mayor's Award to yet another local business - the Chick-Fil-A store on Harbor Blvd.  Operator Tammy Guadagno was praised for  outstanding community support.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
We had some new rules last night.  A big sign behind the City Clerk advised that speaker cards must be given to the staff member in the lobby.  Also, Mensinger imposed a rule where you MUST come to the speaker podium promptly or you cannot speak.  A couple speakers missed their turns.   

Nina Reich praised the signature-gatherers and those who turned out for the Trump demonstrations.  She also expressed concern for the lack of affordable housing.
Ashley Collins and David Twiss again expressed concern about a recent vote made by the Vector Control District to authorize aerial spraying for mosquitos.
Mary Spadoni attended the Trump rally and was concerned about the lack of a Nixle alert by the CMPD to advise residents of traffic issues in the area.  She did praise all the law enforcement officers and command staff present for doing an excellent job.
Chuck Perry told us he loved living in Costa Mesa.
Dr. Richard Mehren - long-time Fairview Park advocate, expressed pleasure at the collection of signatures.
Another individual showed samples of T-shirts with catchy phrases on them and provided a primer on good government.

Beth Refakes expressed concern about the apparent wheeling and dealing going on with the Attic Theater/Costa Mesa Women's Club.  She was concerned that the women were being taken advantage of and explained the terms of the deal as she understood them.
Kristine Bogner expressed concern about speaking at the meetings for fear that her photo might appear in "a blog".  Well, she's right... here she is!  She encouraged folks to come and speak up.
Ralph Taboada asked for more bike racks at parks and commercial areas, expressing concern that bicyclers were being cited for chaining their bikes to sign posts when racks were not available.
This fella, I've heard him referred to as Iggy, spoke again and once again complained about the incomplete 55 Freeway through town.  This time he used the term "bat guano" instead of his previous epithet.
Barrie Fisher provided statistics on how sober living organizations were circumventing the new ordinances.
Kim Hendricks thanked the Fairview Park Initiative volunteers.
Greg Thunnel blamed the Trump riots on the council members.
Jay Humphrey praised the Fairview Park petition gatherers and criticized the management of the Fair and event center for not being good neighbors, referring to the Trump rally.  Nine more speakers were trailed to the end of the meeting.
AERIAL SPRAYING RESPONSE
During Council Member Comments Sandy Genis explained in great detail why the decision was made by the Vector Control District to do aerial spraying, citing the very serious public health threat of the West Nile virus.  She also expressed concern about the minimal communication about the Trump event from city staff.  She also expressed extreme concern about language that was added to the Draft General Plan regarding the "repurposing of Fairview Park" and included the mention of playing fields.
MORE MOSQUITO QUESTIONS
Gary Monahan had nothing of his own to say, but asked Genis about "mosquito fish" as a solution to the mosquito problem.  He also asked CEO Tom Hatch to investigate a system used by the Mesa Water District to circulate water to keep mosquito breeding down.
FULL SPEED AHEAD ON SOBER LIVING ENFORCEMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer asked City Attorney Tom Duarte if the sober living lawsuit with Solid Landings had been signed, and if so, may we now enforce the two sober living ordinances?  The answer was yes.  He addressed the Trump event and was concerned about the short notice received, but praised the CMPD for their response to the issue.  He said he was "proud of the culture in our department."  What a great irony, since his minions have, for a couple years, vilified the CMPD for what they called the "culture of corruption."  What a hypocrite!
TRUMP AND HELPING NEIGHBORS
Mensinger praised the CMPD for their performance during the Trump event and mentioned that "people think I run the police department so I got many messages about not enough use of force, too much use of force."  I could only but smile...  He told us of the Neighbors Helping Neighbors event that he, Monahan and Righeimer participated in recently, and mentioned that one of the houses they spruced up was the home of local Pop Warner football icon, Ed Baume - recently deceased.  He told us he promised Ed he would fix up his house.  Sorry, but that seems just a little peculiar to me.
MAYOR'S CELEBRATION
Mensinger also told us his Mayor's Celebration is coming up next week and his former employer, George Argyros and wife Julia, would be feted, as would Hank Panian.  And he thanked Director of Public Services Ernesto Munoz for the great job being done sprucing up Harbor Boulevard, and mentioned the monument signage denoting "College Park" near the recently-remodeled GMC dealership.

TRUMP EVENT AND CRONEY ORDINANCE
Katrina Foley addressed the Trump event, too, saying you can't blame the Fair Board because they had no say whatosever in that event.  She praised our public safety folks.  She suggested we should bill the Trump campaign for damage to municipal property and the costs involved in keeping order.  She asked Hatch about the "Croney" ordinance, required to be implemented by any city with a COIN ordinance and was told the staff is implementing it.  It involves any contract over $250,000.
BETTER BRANDING
She told us of a recent conference by the Orange County Visitors Bureau at which municipal branding was emphasized.  She offered a long opinion on how we could be doing a better job of branding our city.

A NEW PIANO
She had left the chambers briefly and explained that she was at Costa Mesa High School for the unveiling of a recently acquired - through significant donations - of a concert grand piano.

BUDGET MEETINGS COMING UP
Mensinger almost overlooked Hatch again, but given the chance he reported on several things.  He advised that we should NOT be ticketing bike riders when racks are not available.  He told us the budget process is underway, and that a budget study session will be held next Tuesday at 5:00 p.m. - but didn't say where.  He said there will be a community meeting on May 19th at 5:30, but didn't say where.  He said the budget will be adopted at the meeting of June 21st.
NO AGREEMENT ON THE THEATER
Regarding the Women's Club/Attic Theater, he said he only knew of informal discussions and that the City has NOT entered into any agreement.

MEETING THE EXPERT ON DISTRICTS
Assistant CEO Rick Francis spoke briefly about the upcoming Voting By District meetings, stating that there would be a series of meetings with small groups - 2-3 people at a time - with the expert demographer hired for this process.  This image gives you the dates and the number to call to be included.  Larger, community meetings will be held in June.  He indicated we really had NO choice in how this process plays out because the issue WILL be on the ballot in November.
CHIEF GOT A STANDING "O"
Police Chief Rob Sharpnack spent the next 20 minutes giving us a briefing on the Trump event.  His report was thorough and professional.  I cannot begin to cover all his points, except to note that the patience and control exhibited by the members of the CMPD and other agencies involved kept the chaos to a minumum.  The crowd clapped when he finished.
Three items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion at the end of the meeting.

CDBG PASSED WITH TINKERING
Public Hearing #1 dealt with the use of CDBG and HOME funds.  Consultant Mike Linares provided the staff report.  Members of some of the groups being granted funds spoke.  Representatives of California Elwyn, which was receiving no funds, expressed concern and advised that it would mean a shortage of staff to help manage their programs.  Andy Smith, the spokesman for the city committee charged with assessing the groups using criteria created by the council, advised how the process was conducted and why Elwyn came up short.  Eventually, Katrina Foley moved that eight of the recipients would have their stipend reduced by $500 and the resultant $4000 would be given to Elwyn.  It passed, 3-2, with Mensinger and Monahan voting NO.
COULD HAVE BEEN RESOLVED IN 5 MINUTES
For the next 90 minutes Jim Righeimer's vindictive Affordable Housing Bond was the subject of discussion.  For this issue to move forward four of the five council members were required to vote in the affirmative.  Celeste Brady, representing the law firm coordinating this activity, gave the staff presentation.  In response to a question by Foley it was acknowledge that we have already spent $25,000 on this issue to this point.  It was clear early-on that Foley was NOT in favor of this issue.  To capsulize some of her thoughts - she thought there had NOT been enough thought given to this.  This is precisely the kind of issue that called for a study session so the council could talk among themselves to flesh out concerns.  We have not had a study session in a long, long time - apparently because Righeimer and Mensinger know they've got the votes to do whatever they want, so things like this just happen.
RIGHEIMER'S VINDICTIVE SCHEME
You will recall that in an earlier meeting Righeimer warned affordable housing advocates that he was going to put a $20 million bond on the ballot and if it didn't pass - it takes a 2/3 vote - or the people don't even give it more than 50%, then they should never come back complaining about no affordable housing.
A MATTER OF TRUST
Although Brady did a very professional job, Foley was tenacious and the fact that we had NO idea how this money might be spent really stuck in her craw.  Same with Genis.  At one point Foley said, "It's a matter of trust."  She went on to say that trust had not been developed on the dais.  Righeimer retorted it was a matter of "Brown Rules" - we assume he meant "Brown Act Rules", but one never knows with him.  Foley barked back that it's why there should have been a study session.

NOBODY SUPPORTED IT!
Eight people spoke to this issue during the public hearing.  None supported it - including Affordable Housing advocates!  They, too, were concerned about the lack of a plan.  Cindy Brenneman told the council that she wasn't going to vote for the bond, but that she'd give them $25.00 right now if it would help with housing right now.  That amount was presumed to be what each property owner would see on their property tax bill to pay for the bond.
Tamar Goldmann said she couldn't believe that a man who swore "no new taxes" was advocating exactly that.  She told them to "butt out of housing issues."
Kathy Esfahani, the most vocal advocate for affordable housing, was leary of this plan and said they would have all their eggs in one basket.
Jay Humphrey told the council this reminded him of the Charter debacles - where one person decided to move forward without any kind of study session, and he reminded Righeimer of that mess.
Wendy Leece reminded Righeimer of his "no new taxes" pledge.
Mary Spadoni observed that "we just can't trust this group".
WHAT?
Righeimer voted to move the issue forward and Monahan seconded it.  He said, "I seconded it, but I don't know if I agree with it.  I don't know if I'll vote for it in November."  Now, isn't that a crock?!

NOT ENOUGH ANSWERS
Genis continued to harp on the language of the item which describes it being used for "low and moderate" housing.  She got into a discussion of what earnings level constituted "moderate" - turns out it's over $100,000 per year.  She and Foley seemed concerned that this money would be used to facilitate developers building luxury housing with a tiny piece devoted to affordable housing.  Again, a matter of trust.
YET ANOTHER RIGHEIMER FAILURE
Righeimer continued to try to massage this thing to approval,  even "offering" control of the commitee that would be put together to manage it to Foley/Genis.  Evenutally the vote was taken and it failed, 2-3, with Genis, Foley and Mensinger voting NO.  Keep in mind, it would have taken four of the five to approve it.

BIA RE-AUTHORIZED
The final agenda item was the re-authorization of the Business Improvement Area for the Conference and Visitor Bureau.  We had a good presentation from Paulette Lobardi Fries, saw a nice video and heard about how our money is being spent.  Foley had many ideas about how it might be spent in the future.  During the discussion, as Foley proposed a couple ideas, Righeimer spit back at her that he "wanted something actionable" - he was upset that she didn't have a plan.  Is it just me, or is that a great irony - him asking for a plan when he was just trying to bamboozle the voters into handing him $20 million with out a plan!  The council voted, 5-0, to approve the program again.
WARRANT QUESTIONS
Quick work was made of the three items pulled from the Consent Calendar.  Greg Thunnel pulled the Warrant and spent a couple minutes pointing out specific items he didn't understand.  It passed 4-0 - Genis took a break.

I.T. ITEM CONTINUED
Foley asked item #6 to be continued until the next meeting - it dealt with a revamp of the city internet infrastructure.

KOKEN EXPLAINED HIS SITUATION
Two people hung around to be heard in the trailed Public Comments.  One was Terry Koken, who used his three minutes to address the events of his recent visit by a police officer because of his song at the last meeting.  He said it was political harrassment and suggested Mensinger had filed the complaint.  He said it was pure intimidation - all the things we discussed in my blog post about the event.  He demanded Mensinger come out from behind the facade and admit he did it.
A DIFFERENT VIEW OF THE RIOT
Jeff Cohen took exception to the description earlier of the way the CMPD handled the Trump event.  He was there and had a different viewpoint - indicating they didn't know what they were doing.
The meeting abruptly ended at 10:40.

ON SIMMER FOR AWHILE
That's it for awhile, loyal readers.  I'm turning the Caulderon down to simmer for awhile, so local politicians can get a little breather.  We'll be back soon.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

General Plan, More Development Move On

 ANOTHER INTERESTING MEETING
The Costa Mesa Planning Commission met again Monday night and things went about as anticipated, although not without some interesting twists.
TWO COMMISSIONERS MISSING
To begin with, Vice Chair Jeff Mathews and Commissioner Tim Sesler were absent, so that left only three commissioners to consider the issues before the commission.

REPORT ON EGGSTRAVAGANZA AT CAMP PENDLETON
During Public Comments four (4) residents spoke.  Beth Refakes gave a report, with slide show on the recent Easter Egg event at Camp Pendleton for the children of the 1/5 Marines.  She and her compatriots on the Military Affairs Team have been collecting plastic eggs, toys and candies for the children and last Thursday was the event.  According to Refakes, it was a rousing success, with more than 2,000 eggs collected, packaged and delivered.  The Easter Bunny was present to spread the joy.
CRITICIZING DEVELOPMENT
Former council candidate Chris McEvoy stepped to the podium to chide the commissioners for perpetuating the density/traffic problems in the city.  He asked them how they "fix a problem by adding to a problem."  He accused the commission of bending the rules to accommodate developers.
PROTECTING FAIRVIEW PARK
Kim Hendricks addressed the commission on the Fairview Park Initiative and encouraged folks to sign the petitions being circulated.
FIGHTING SOBER LIVING PROLIFERATION
Resident 47 (who prefers to remain anonymous) told the commission about an effort by a San Clemente group that is organizing to fight the impact on sober living homes in their community, much like Costa Mesa's Take Back Our Neighborhoods (TBON) has tried to do in recent years.  She announced the existence of an online petition, assessable via the TBON website at www.tboncostamesa.com by clicking on the red "alert" section at the top of the home page.  The goal is to spread this movement state-wide.  She also spoke of a March 18, 2016 meeting in Irvine at which this issue was discussed by many elected leaders, including Congressman Dana Rhorabacher, who apparently feigned ignorance of the issue until that very moment, and others.  She complained that few Costa Mesa officials were present - only Sandra Genis was present among our elected officials.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
During Commissioner Comments Stephan Andranian commended the volunteers for their efforts on behalf of the kids of the 1/5 Marines.
"TAKES ORDERS.."
Colin McCarthy expressed surprise that the City Council recently overturned one of the commissions decisions - on a religious/cultural center near John Wayne Airport, and stated at one point, he "takes orders from our elected leaders."
"DOESN'T TAKE ORDERS..."
Chairman Rob Dickson, responding to a critic who accused commissioners of "taking instructions via cell phone on the dais", said "I don't take orders on how to vote."  OK, so he doesn't and McCarthy does, right?
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AGAIN
Public Hearing #1 was the second cut at the General Plan Update and the Draft Environmental Impact Report.  There was no formal staff presentation.  The hearing was to, once again, gather public comments and observations from the commissioners.  Minoo Ashabi guided the discussion and reiterated that formal written comments are due no later than close of business on April 18, 2016.
NO LAND USE CHANGE FOR FAIRVIEW PARK
McCarthy asked about the relationship to the General Plan Update and Fairview Park and was told that there is NO land use change to the park in the General Plan Update.

NINE SPEAKERS
Nine people spoke on this issue.  Former councilwoman Wendy Leece observed that the writing was better in the update, then asked several questions about a survey that was conducted, Cultural Resources section and more - and asked for more details.
Former councilman Jay Humphrey observed that it appeared there was a cumulative effect on density bonuses, and that the prior height restriction on development south of the I-405 was being abandoned.
Christine Nolfe, Linda Ting and Kathy Esfahani each spoke representing the Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition and asked for greater density zoning - 40 dwelling units per acre instead of the 20 proposed -  for the Fairview Developmental Site, which is a perfect place for much-needed low income housing.
Kim Hendricks again observed that Fairview Park should not be considered for unnecessary Sports Fields, calling the so-called need for sports fields a myth.

Rick Huffman asked several questions about specific statistics in the Land Use Element.
Parks and Recreation Commissioner Bob Graham observed about some of the recent projects built on the Westside - multi-story with rooftop patios.  He said they needed 1) a dumb waiter system because hauling groceries and other objects is too difficult; 2) Each such unit should include a central vacuum system and 3) Each should include a rooftop patio.
Resident 47 observed that the Small Lot Ordinance should be eliminated, that old traffic studies were being used to make decisions, that infrastructure like sewers should be replaced before more dense development is approved and that the Banning Ranch will have a significant impact on the city.

FIELD USE INTERROGATION
The commissioners thanked all the speakers for their comments.  McCarthy asked consultant Laura Stetson about sports fields and dragged from her that the numbers include school district fields that fall under the Joint Use Agreement, and that the agreement could be changed or cancelled at any time.  The commission continued this item to the Planning Commission meeting on April 11, 2016 on a 3-0 vote.
592 HAMILTON DEVELOPMENT
Public Hearing #2 is the development of six units at 592 Hamilton Street.  The developer, Nick Louis, is a small developer - this will be his biggest project.  He asked the commission to waive the requirement for undergrounding the utilities - he said such an effort would actually involve eight (8) properties.  Following about 40 minutes of discussion the commission passed it on a 2-1 vote, with Andranian voting NO.  However, the decision left in place the requirement for undergrounding utilities, so - as McCarthy observed - it was probably a deal-killer because of the cost.  It will be interesting to see if the applicant appeals the decision, hoping that other recent projects where the undergrounding requirement might impact this decision.
10 UNITS ON BERNARD STREET
Public Hearing #3 is the project at 522 and 526 Bernard Street.  This is resurrection of a long-dormant project that had received approvals back in 2013.  This is a new developer, Patric Lynam, who changed the project from a condominium project to detached individual homes.  There was much concern about the ratio of enclosed to open parking spaces - the ratio seemed reversed to McCarthy.  In the end the project was approved on another 2-1 vote, with Andranian again voting NO because of the parking issues and the fact that the developer apparently did not comply with the City Council recommendation that he find alternate parking solutions.  This project also required undergrounding utilities, but the developer didn't bat an eye at that requirement.


33 UNITS ON HARBOR BLVD.
After a short break Public Hearing #4, the 33 unit development on 3.71 acres at the corner of Harbor Blvd. and Merrimac - 2626 Harbor - was discussed.  This project met every requirement and more.  For example, it has over 50% open space, including a dedicated private park.  It is less dense by 25%.  Former City Director of Development Services and Deputy CEO Peter Naghavi is the consultant on the project and he presented a lengthy, detailed presentation.  One of the requirements is for lighting along Harbor Blvd and Merrimac - a requirement not seen in the city before.  When the vote was taken the resolution was crafted to not REQUIRE the lighting, but for both Development Services and Public Services to work with the developer to determine IF such lighting is really necessary.  Concern was expressed by staff that because street lighting along Harbor is in the center divider it may not meet the minimun illumination standards.  Shortly afetr 9:15 the  item passed on a 3-0 vote and the meeting was adjourned.


DEVELOPMENT STAMPEDE CONTINUES
It was an interesting night for development in the city.  We saw two projects not passed unanimously and one of which, despite being passed, may be Dead On Arrival due to the requirement to underground the utilities.  A couple of the developments were resurrected projects with new developers.  And, we are seeing the beginning of the metamorphosis of Harbor Blvd. from a commercial corriedor into a mixed bag of residential and commercial and I'm wondering just how this is going to play out.  The development at Harbor and Merrimac is directly across the street from the recently rebuilt Cadillac dealership - a project that continues to give neighbors on the other side fits due to light spillage.  It's going to be interesting to see how that new housing development works out, since it's located on one of our busiest commercial streets and has commercial operations on two sides of it.  And, so, the development stampede through Costa Mesa continues.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,