THE "SIX P" APPROACH

Over at the Costa Mesa Brief YouTube site, publisher
Barry Friedland has given us another very
Professionally-
Produced
Pandering
Piece of
Political
Pontification for his buddy, Costa Mesa Mayor
Jim Righeimer. Further on down in this entry I've provided a link to it so you can watch Righeimer spew his campaign mantra for 2:32, but before we go there, let's take his piece segment-by-segment for some perspective.
TAKING CREDIT WHERE...?
He begins by saying, "
We've done a lot of things in the last few years here in Costa Mesa and I wanta tell you just about a few of them." We are presuming that the royal "we", and that he's taking personal credit for all the things he's about to present... we continue...
SIMPLIFICATION BY SIMPLE MINDS
He then tells us, "
The biggest issue to our city is obviously our budget. In previous years we have spent over 35 million dollars more than we brought in." He conveniently neglects to tell you that the expenditure of reserves during that period was necessitated by the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression 80 years ago! He and his buddies frequently use the term, "
Blew through the reserves." - a simplification of a complex issue by simple, politically-motivated minds. Those reserves were in place for exactly what happened - created by actual forward-thinking, conservative (not just in name only) civic leaders in the event of such an event.
OK, BUT...
Righeimer then proceeds... "
In the last two years we've reversed this. Last year we saved over 7.1 million dollars on our budget. In the last two years, 13.4 million dollars." He goes on to tell you how "we" did that, but neglects to mention the biggest savings came from disemboweling the organization by not hiring people! He refused to let both the police and fire departments hire replacements in a timely manner and operates with a flawed perception of just how many public safety employees are necessary to actually keep this city safe. Service levels dropped across the board.
A "MINOR ISSUE" WHEN COMPARED TO LEGAL COSTS

He takes credit for what he refers to as a "
minor issue", a modification of the handling of Workers Compensation claims - a good change that apparently will result in a $500,000 annual savings. He may consider that "minor" when he and his pals cause the city to spend that much on legal costs in a quarter.
OUTSOURCING THE JAIL

He goes on to say, "
We also worked extremely close with our Police Department to reorganize the City Jail, and that reorganization is going to save us 3.2 million dollars over the next five years." When he says "worked closely" he means that they forced the Police Department to outsource the jail functions to a private firm to chip away at the municipal employee base that he holds in such contempt.
CLOSE, BUT NO CIGAR

Then he tells us, "
One other big issue we had was working extremely closely with the Fire Department to make sure they could be more effective, more nimble and save money." He then takes credit for the new deployment plan created by Interim Fire Chief
Tom Arnold that revolves around the acquisition and deployment of new Paramedic Vans and cites a savings of "
over one million dollars a year." What he doesn't tell you is that, even though we have those new magnificent pieces of equipment, they are not yet deployed because we don't have the staff to do it! We have
TWO deployed and four of those quarter-million dollar units sitting around, waiting. Even when the department is staffed properly the current plan is to deploy only
FOUR of them, with
TWO in reserve. Doesn't make sense to me. And, the klinker here is that we don't have staff to do it, so the staff of the Fire Department is still required to work horrendous overtime hours - sometimes doubling their normal work schedule - in an attempt to provide safety to the city.
THE CRIMINALS AROUND YOU

He then says, "
The other issues we have in this city is to make sure that we keep our city a safe city. One of the things I always say is 'Crime is caused by who lives in your city and who you attract to your city.' We've had a big problem with attracting people that weren't good to our city through the motels we've had here." He goes on to tell us that, "
We've worked extremely hard with those motel owners to make sure that they run a tight ship."
BLUDGEONING MOTEL OWNERS

What he doesn't tell you is that he has stated many times that those motel owners had a distorted view of the value of their properties, so he's used code enforcement, police calls and fire department visits to bludgeon them into lowering their expectations. He's used new ordinances - the Nuisance Ordinance and the Excessive Use of Resources Ordinance - to squeeze those operators so they'll be more compliant when developers come calling. Tuesday, at the City Council meeting, we'll see the results of those efforts with a proposal to turn the
Costa Mesa Motor Inn - one of those "problem motels" - into 236 "luxury apartments" located on Harbor Boulevard, across the street from Home Depot and MacDonalds. Earlier in the agenda we will see the Conditional Use Permit for another of those businesses,
Sandpiper Motel, revoked. It's kind of like watching hunters clubbing baby harp seals to death, for goodness sake!
A WONDERFUL CITY... AND

He closes by telling us what a wonderful city we have, citing the weather, proximity to the ocean and South Coast Plaza, then says, "
We just have to make sure that we continue to move forward and spend the dollars we have on infrastructure and parks - things that make our city a nicer place to live - and make sure that those things going forward continue to be funded. That's what I want to do - that's what I'm going to continue to do here as your mayor here in Costa Mesa."
OK, BUT LET ME ASK YOU, MR. MAYOR

Well, OK, Mr. Mayor. Your priorities are potholes and parks, not public safety - we get that. Will those young families you're trying to attract come to a city where the two top elected officials are actually suing the men and women of their police department? Will they move to a place where, in a fit of pique, the mayor refused to let the Chief of Police hire replacements for most of a year? We have 28 vacancies - two more highly-skilled officers left Friday for other jobs elsewhere and nearly a dozen officers out with "injured on duty" issues. As of Monday we will have fewer than 100 sworn members of the Costa Mesa Police Department able to work. Subtract from that 31 members of the supervisory/command staff and, through the vindictive stubbornness of the mayor and his malleable majority, the CMPD will now operate with fewer than 70 actual officers on patrol! Will those people feel safer knowing that?
TOXIC WORKPLACE
.jpeg)
Will they want to live in a city where the mayor has created such a toxic workplace for the municipal staff that they leave in droves - particularly in the police ranks? Will they want to live in a city where Fire Department personnel are required to work horrendous overtime hours because the mayor and his council majority refuse to take a realistic view of the staffing needs of this city? And, will they want to live in a place where that same mayor then chides firefighters about being greedy - referring to them as "
$350,000-a-year firefighters", when those numbers reflected one member of the staff who worked more than 4,000 hours in a year, and were a direct result of
THEIR edicts about hiring?
HEAVY-HANDED HEARTLESSNESS

Will those young, affluent families he says he wants to attract want to live in a city where the mayor and his pals illegally - and unnecessarily - attempt to layoff nearly half the so-called "miscellaneous employees", causing one to commit suicide and a lawsuit that has lingered for almost two years? How will they feel about a huge chunk of the municipal budget being spent on lawyers to defend their bogus schemes?
OOPS!

Their demands backfired a little when their developer-buddies began having a tough time getting their projects processed. The staff has been so severely diminished that it's been necessary to spend thousands of dollars for technical support consultants to do plan check, inspections and other functions instead of being able to rely on city staffers - with knowledge and experience in our rules and policies to efficiently do the work. Then, again, I believe that's the mayor's view of municipal government. As I've said before, I think he wants to outsource
EVERYTHING and leave only a City Manager (grandiosely re-titled "
Chief Executive Officer") and a handful of contract administrators to oversee the outsourced operations. No city employees, no employee associations to deal with - just "contracts" with pals and campaign contributors.
EXPECT MORE...

As we now enter the campaign season - in less than three months we will know who is actually going to run for the two open City Council positions in November - we will see more of this manipulation of the public by Righeimer and his cronies. If you want to watch the clip I referred to, click
HERE. I could have embedded it in this post, but it starts automatically and I wanted you to read what I wrote without distraction. You may wish to return to re-read what I wrote after watching...
Labels: Barry Frieland, CMFD, CMPD, Costa Mesa Brief, Huy Pham, Jim Righeimer, outsourcing