Thursday, April 10, 2014

Planning Commission Agenda

Next Monday, April 14, 2014, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission will meet for their first meeting this month.  The agenda can be viewed HERE.  The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers at City Hall.

This one has the potential to be VERY interesting.  The Consent Calendar contains  a couple items that will be of interest for you to review, even if they do not get pulled for discussion on Monday.  #2 is the Code Enforcement Update, HERE.  #3 is the 2013 Annual Review of the General Plan, HERE.

There are two public hearings scheduled for the evening.  #1, HERE, is a review of the Conditional Use Permit for offsite parking at The Camp on Randolph Avenue.  The applicant wants the CUP to run until it's no longer needed, avoiding another review in another ten years.  The staff recommends approval.


Public Hearing #2, HERE, is the dicey one for the evening.  This one recommends that the Planning Commission direct the staff to prepare a resolution that either indicates that the Sandpiper Motel has been operating in violation of its CUP and/or as a public nuisance and revoke the CUP, OR conclude there are insufficient findings to revoke it and allow the business to continue to operate.  This should be a very interesting discussion.


The final item on the agenda, New Business #1, is the Status Report on 2013 Planning Commission Goals, HERE.  This was delayed from a previous meeting because they just ran out of time.  The staff report provides information on the ten (10) goals the commission set for itself last year and makes suggestions for 2014 goals.  The ten goals for last year are listed below:

  1. Adoption of a Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance.
  2. Proactive Enforcement of Convenience Markets and Liquor Stores.
  3. Modification of Fire Prevention Turnaround requirements in site planning for properties.
  4. Motel Solutions and Enforcement.
  5. Additional parking requirements for nightclubs, coffee shops with Wi-Fi access, and small food & beverage establishments.
  6. Updating of sign standards and requirements.
  7. Develop landscape pallets for market windows and arterials.
  8. Review "Enhanced Code Enforcement Project".  Did it accomplish goals?  Were hardship cases treated respectfully?  Were there many hardship cases?.
  9. Commissioner Participation in the General Plan Meetings.... How many?
  10. With the liquor store, bars, restaurants morphing into night spots, does Costa Mesa have alcohol related arrests/problems due to these establishments? 
A quick peek at the staff report will give you plenty of information about their "accomplishments".

Labels: ,

Contemplating A Successful Business

I was chatting on the telephone with a friend the other evening when the subject of a business owned by his relatives came up.  This business, which goes back to the horse-and-buggy days, remains a benchmark for superior products and service in its field.

As we talked I fired up the computer and found the company web site, which gave much of the company history - a multi-generational family business, still growing strong even in tough economic times.  As I jumped from page to page on the site I came across one titled, "Vision, Mission and Values" and, at the end of that page was this chart, "Core Values".
(Click on the image to enlarge)

I read down through that list and found myself thinking, "Wow! Seven simple statements about the values that are important to this business, and should be to ANY business!" Take a moment to read those values again...
Then I thought about the City of Costa Mesa, and the bogus attempt by the current council majority - primarily driven by Mayor Jim Righeimer - to run the city like a business.  Unfortunately, the "business" model they've chosen seems not to have any core values like those stated above... and that's a shame. 
In my opinion, our city should NOT be run like a business - it should be run like a city, guided by core values like those shown above and by the application of fair, reasonable laws and policies that place the well-being of the residents of the city first.  No business can operate successfully with such a top-heavy management structure, where party planners and public relations schemes are placed ahead of public safety and excellent service to the residents and visitors to this city.

This is something to contemplate as we enter what will certainly be a very, very contentious campaign season.

Labels: , ,

60th Anniversary Meeting - The Boil Is Lanced... (Amended)**

Last night more than a dozen members of the 60th Anniversary Celebration Committee, plus another thirty members of the public, were crammed into half of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) for the long-delayed "after action" report about the event.  The agenda is HERE.
As I mentioned before, this meeting probably could have - and should have - been held last summer, shortly after the 3-day event that was the center piece of the celebration.  There were plenty of operational gaffes that would have been discussed and put behind the committee and the City Staff.  However, circumstances - the huge question mark about the management of the finances of the event - got in the way and this meeting was put off, and put off and put off.  And, as you might expect, concerns turned to anger and frustration and the whole thing began to fester like a boil.  Last night it was lanced.

Chairman Mike Scheafer kicked things off by welcoming all the participants and the interested residents, as well.  He set out the ground rules - no personal attacks and try to keep it as positive as possible - then thanked the committee for an outstanding job.  Then he handed the ball off to City Chief Executive Officer Tom Hatch for an overview.

Hatch spent most of the next twenty minutes falling on his sword.  He apologized for the mistakes made during the event and indicated he was looking forward to hearing the observations of the public and volunteers who worked to make the event a success.

He discussed the reports handed out last night, including the Executive Summary of the Financial audit of the event.  He said he was very disappointed in the way things went - that procedures were not followed that led to what he called "unbudgeted event growth".  I think that was a kind way of saying somebody spent city cash like a drunken sailor!  He spoke of the violation of purchasing policies and procedures and "shortfall" on cash controls.  He said, "I was not aware of the violation of procedures and unauthorized event growth."  He went on to say if he had been aware of them he would have stopped them.  OK...  He said he called for an immediate audit when he finally became aware of the problems.

Hatch went on to discuss "reforms" being put in place to stop the abuses we saw with this event.  He discussed:
  • Heightened awareness within the Finance Department, which he has charged with being the place where such abuses will be stopped in the future.  He said that department will be the "Eyes and Ears" to control that kind of abuse.
  • A new "buyer" position has been authorized and has been filled.  The sole responsibility of that buyer will be oversight of purchasing processes.
  • Interviewing continues for a new Purchasing Supervisor, to oversee the buyer's activities.
  • All analysts and Managers will receive increased purchasing training.
  • The Purchasing Manual will be revised.
Again, he apologized for all the missteps.  It was very painful to hear him speak because one had the impression that, while the proverbial "buck" stopped with him, there had been forces beyond his control that may have contributed to the situation.  Certainly, he trusted certain people too much.

At 6:30 the Public Comments segment began, with each speaker being given 2 minutes to address any issue involving the 60th Anniversary celebration.  Fourteen (14) people stood to address the committee and staff.  The comments were wide-ranging.  I'll not try to provide a word-for-word transcript, but will give you a taste of what was said.

Several speakers were very angry about the way volunteers were treated.  They spoke from personal experience, having volunteered at the event.  They described the treatment as "terrible" and wanted to name names, but honored the request by Scheafer and Hatch to not do that - almost.  Complaints ranged from verbal abuse to inconsiderate behavior regarding assignments, break venues, providing water, etc.

Harold Weitzberg, an unofficial committee member who worked tirelessly, and said he thought the event was terrific, acknowledged that his experience was not the same as others who spoke, but understood their frustration.  He also acknowledged that Sue Lester and Cindy Brenneman had done an outstanding job of trying to promote the event.

Flo Martin questioned the process by which SUN Group was selected to provide talent for the event, citing a lack of a formal Request for Proposals, and spoke of the numerous check authorizations NOT signed by Chair Scheafer, but "for" him by Dan Joyce and Christine Cordon.

Jay Humphrey compared what happened in this instance to what could very well happen under a Charter with insufficient controls on no-bid contracts.  He compared it to the City of Bell.  He said what happened in this instance "speaks to the culture of the people who made the decisions and what they thought they could get away with."

Reggie Mundekis suggested that the Conference and Visitors Bureau had become a de facto "slush fund" for pet projects by certain council members and suggested a mechanism be created to "wall off" the CVB from other city activities.  She also wondered if the proper paperwork was submitted for whatever free tickets and other coupons that may have been distributed during the event.

Beth Refakes, a conscientious regular at most city meetings for years and long-time resident, presented a laundry list of what she perceived to be faults of the process/execution of the celebration.  Her criticisms ranged from relying too much on social media for publicity to no bottled water and/or cooling stations for volunteers.  She wondered whether we actually got a good return on our investment, with more than a half million dollars being spent on entertainment for 16 thousand people.

Robin Leffler also addressed the "signature" issue, calling them "forged".  She also speculated that it was unlikely that such misdeeds happened because of only one person - that the decisions were not likely made in a vacuum.

Anna Vrska briefly mentioned that her lengthy analysis of the files resulted in what she thought was a $10,000 shortfall in revenue and offered to go over her findings with staff to resolve it.

Charles Mooney said the 60th celebration was a "great event", but that the management controls were terrible.

A frustrated and very angry Theresa Drain called for a forensic audit of the entire 60th celebration process.

Weitzberg chimed in at the end, suggesting that an ad hoc group be formed to help push the resolution of pending issues along.  Hatch said he would discuss it with the City Council, since it was they who formed the committee.

The meeting then turned to the comments by committee members, to use as much time as they chose to discuss what they thought was good or bad about the event, and how things could be improved.

First up was Bob Ooten, a Director of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and Chairman of the "Sustainability" Sub-committee.  He told us his group produced a pamphlet that could be used forever for such events and that they spend "Zero" of their $3,500 budget.  He said it had been difficult to get together with other sub-committees.

Kim Pederson, Vice-Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, thanked all the volunteers and staff, and the public for coming and speaking out.  He hoped that the negatives wouldn't drown out all the positives from the event.

Charlene Ashendorf, Chair of the Scarecrow event, was disappointed that the promotion team seemed to simply run out of gas by the time her event came around in October.  She praised Chairman Scheafer, saying that he never let them down.  She said she and her volunteers spent thousands of hours creating the scarecrows, and that they spent only $4,000 of their $10,000 budget.

Rob Dickson, Vice Chair of the Planning Commission, was the Chairman of the Kickoff event, expressed disappointment that so much money was spent on big name bands and not on local talent.  He suggested that the "taste of" event should have exclusively Costa Mesa eateries.  He indicated that the Kick Off event evolved into something where only two people had any control - he didn't name names.  He indicated that, even though he was Chairman of the event, he had no authority to act on issues, and that future such events should have clear lines of authority.  He praised the volunteers for their hard work and Hatch for his candor.

Lynell Brooks was the Chair of the Volunteers and praised them all.  She said there were lots of very talented people with good leadership skills, but those talents were not fully utilized.  She also said there was not enough time to properly put this kind of event together.  She also bemoaned that it became a regional event, not a Costa Mesa event.

Cecily Renteria is an employee of the Recreation Department and was appointed by Hatch to the committee.  She observed that there seemed to not be enough time, too.

Councilwoman Wendy Leece observed that the event got too big.  She also observed that many of the volunteers were not "Costa Mesa" volunteers, but were from the Orange County Marathon.  She also expressed concern about the "taste of" choices, indicating that the contract provided for the inclusion of outside Costa Mesa vendors.  She also expressed concern about the beer pulls cash distribution.

Howard Hull told us he was in charge of the beer pull cash distribution.  Previously, there had been concern about how the cash was handled.  He also said he, personally, contacted many Costa Mesa restaurants about participating but all he got were "no's" for an answer.  During the criticism by some committee members and members of the public that was clearly directed squarely at him I observed him making notes and smirking.

Cindy Brenneman, first finished reading Theresa Drain's comments, mentioning lack of proper radios, water, shade, etc.  Then, as herself, she praised several committee members for their outstanding work and mentioned that Howard Hull had been the one who abused some of the volunteers and failed to provide water for them.  She also observed that this committee worked for months on what was supposed to be a year-long event and barely got an acknowledgment while the Charter Committee got expensive plaques and a party to celebrate their accomplishment.  She cited the need for more checks and balances in financial matters.

Sue Lester then launched into what turned out to be at least 20 minutes of positive and negative observations.  She praised staffers Mike Brumbaugh, Bob Knapp and Dan Baker for service above and beyond the call of duty.  She thought that the community had a great time.  She wondered what happened to the "permanent piece of art" that was supposed to be part of the celebration - to the tune of $50,000 $10,000. (10% of expenditures, originally estimated at $125,000, not the more than $500,000 actually spent.  See Sue Lester comment, below).  There's no sign of it, or a plan for it.  She talked about the Sustainability committee doing a great job, and how great the Car Show was.

She talked about the great volunteer turnout, and what a great job the coordinators did, except when they were usurped by Hull.  She also mentioned that some committee members failed to fulfill their tasks during the event.

She wondered where all the money went, and described the event as an "Epic Fail" from a financial standpoint.  She expressed concern that the VIP areas should not be in the middle of things - it divided folks.

She observed that, because of this event, she'd been interviewed by both the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Orange County District Attorney!  She found it amusing that she, a former operator of a Medical Marijuana dispensary, had never been interviewed by either body before, but now had been because she chose to volunteer for a community party.  She demanded that The City request the District Attorney tell us if there will be prosecutions, or will they just drop the case.  She felt all the volunteers need to know.  She also asked if the committee will be able to make a presentation to the City Council.

Vice Chair Melinda Lowery then spoke about her role.  She suggested that, in answer to one of the survey questions, "Yes", we should do this kind of event again.  She was very sorry volunteers had been treated so badly.

Chairman Scheafer suggested the next such party be in 15-20 years... and chuckled.  He was concerned about the short time frame available to produce the party and the use of outside, expensive entertainment instead of local talent.  He observed that the committee meetings had been very enthusiastic and full of excitement and focus.

Some observations of my own... As several speakers said, the "Kick Off" event seemed to take all the energy from what was supposed to be a year-long series of celebratory events, particularly when rumors of fiscal improprieties began to surface.  Several lovely events - art contests, the scarecrow event, received very little publicity.  Also, I agree with Sue Lester.  The DA should let us know what's going on.  If it requires Hatch to make an official inquiry, then it should be done, and done soon.

I was disappointed in Hatch.  Clearly, there were serious management foul-ups in this event.  He apparently trusted the wrong people.  And, again, as Robin Leffler observed, it's highly unlikely the things that were messed up occurred in a vacuum.

There were many lessons to be learned from this debacle.  Among the questions that were never answered a year ago is "Why?"  Why have a 60th celebration in the first place?  The second question is, "How did this go so badly?"  I have it on good authority that some of the things that happened were done intentionally.  Proper controls WERE in place - they were just ignored and the gatekeepers in charge of insuring compliance with proper controls and policies were simply bypassed.  I found myself wanting to talk with now-departed former Finance and Information Technology Director, Bobby Young about what happened.  He's the straightest arrow I know, so I cannot imagine him tolerating such procedural violations without direction to do so.  We may never know, but we're certainly entitled to know.

So, this thing is almost over.  The DA's actions - if any - are still pending.  Dan Joyce remains on paid leave.  This whole event has a been a very unhealthy situation for the city.  Too many questions remain unanswered.  Until this situation is resolved I fear this infection will return...

The Mouth From Mesa North, resurfacing after being mostly invisible at meetings over the past couple months, was skulking around the back of the crowd last night.  He arrived late and was relegated to the cheap seats.  Then, about half-way through the meeting, armed with only that snippet of information, he left.  This morning he posted HIS version of events, armed only with his own bias and a teeny piece of the information presented last night, HERE.  Sorry, you'll have to wade through the manure about black on white crime to find the relevant piece.  His complaint about the computers is interesting.  If he had just asked he would have known that those computers he's tucked in behind were in place for the CAD/RMS training on the new program launched earlier this week by the CMPD.  That's why the meeting was crammed into only half the room at the EOC.  This poor sap has become virtually irrelevant in the discussion of important issues in our city - a caricature of himself, with his "Breaking Bad" countenance.  What a waste of what was probably at one time a prodigious intellect.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 09, 2014

Neighborhood Improvement Task Force Report

In a press release issued today, HERE, the City of Costa Mesa informed us that the efforts of the Neighborhood Improvement Task Force, as defined by its 4th Quarter Report - a 28 page document replete with lists of accomplishments and charts and graphs - HERE, has made major inroads with so-called "problem motels" and in the broader homelessness issue within the city.
 (click on chart to enlarge for easier reading)

Highlights of the report include:
  • 710 citations were issued citywide for violations such as drinking in public, urinating or defecating in public, and smoking in a public park.
  • The city inspected 14 motels in 2013 and issued 981 citations for various municipal code violations totaling nearly $26,000 in fines.
  • Among the 12 most problematic motels (in terms of calls for police and fire service), only the Ali Baba, Motel 6 (Gisler Avenue) and Regency Inn had increased in total public safety calls for service in 2013. The Ali Baba had the most significant increase at 36%. The remaining motels had decreased police calls with the La Quinta Inn and Tern Inn having the most significant drops at approximately 43% each.
  • Police officers made nearly 1,700 patrol checks of Lions Park.
  • City staff provided homeless persons with 194 connections to various governmental and private-sector services, including rehabilitation. 
This is great news and all parties involved are to be commended.  It makes one wonder just how much more might have been accomplished if our public safety organizations had been properly staffed.

Labels: ,

Looking Forward To This Evening...

Months ago Cindy Brenneman, long-time community volunteer, activist and member of the 60th Anniversary Celebration Committee, stepped to the speaker's podium and addressed the need to reconcile the issue of the 60th Anniversary.  Finally, this will happen tonight, beginning at 6:00 p.m. at the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) adjacent to the Police Headquarters at 99 Fair Drive.  CEO Tom Hatch and Committee Chairman Mike Scheafer will guide the discussion.  I've written about this several times.  You can read the agenda planned for this meeting HERE, which includes 52 pages if detailed information on the costs of the celebration.

For some pre-meeting perspective you can watch Brenneman's presentation below.  See you this evening.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 08, 2014

Uh, What Redevelopment Project?


One more snippet of Mayor Jim Righeimer on Money Matters with Dino last weekend.  This segment is titled, "Is It Cheaper To Buy Or Cheaper To Build A Home?"  Please note that at about 25 seconds into the video Dino mentions Costa Mesa's "Redevelopment Project".  What's that all about?  Is the mayor telling folks we have a "redevelopment project" in our city?  Really?

Labels: , ,

Setting The Scene...


In case you've forgotten why this meeting is necessary, here's your mayor telling us all about the 60th Anniversary Celebration...

Labels: ,

Monday, April 07, 2014

Another Interesting Morning For The CMPD


Today, just after 9:00 a.m., Costa Mesa police officers responded to a reported traffic accident at 17th Street and Monrovia Avenue.  Due to some alert police work they arrested a 22 year-old man, Derek Felton, with 20 pounds of marijuana, nearly $11,000 in cash, nearly an ounce of cocaine and prescription drugs.  You can read the police Press Release below.

The person arrested turns out to be a former Arizona State University student from Chandler, Arizona, with a goal of becoming a firefighter.  Methinks those aspirations are now dead in the water. He was released on $25,000 bail.
(click on images to enlarge them)

Labels: ,

Righeimer Makes It Up As He Goes Along

In case you're not one of the handful of people who listen to Dino Katsiametis on KEIB, 1150 AM on Sundays, you missed our mayor, Jim Righeimer, making things up as he goes along for all of Southern California to hear.

In a short - less than two-minute - segment of Money Matters with Dino program Righeimer tells the world that a person can save $65,000 when building a new home on an existing lot with something called a "replacement house".  Problem is, that isn't exactly true - yet.

Once again, the mayor jumps the gun on an issue that has not yet been vetted before the City Council.  Folks need to remember this kind of cavalier disregard for the rules when they consider their vote in November.

Here's Hizzoner, once again, for your viewing "pleasure".

Labels: , ,

60th Anniversary Wrap-up Meeting Wednesday

The long-awaited, and long-delayed, wrap-up meeting for the staff and volunteers who worked so diligently last year to produce the three-day 60th Anniversary Celebration will finally happen this Wednesday, April 9, 2014 beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) adjacent to the Police Headquarters at 99 Fair Drive.  You can read the entire 52 page agenda HERE.
That report includes the January 30, 2014 Executive Summary of the 60th Anniversary Event Findings produced by the City Staff, plus some very detailed fiscal summaries.  City CEO Tom Hatch and event Chairman Mike Scheafer will conduct the meeting.  Committee members plus members of the public will have the chance to offer their thoughts.
This could be a very interesting meeting.  Because it's been delayed for three-quarters of a year the concerns and criticisms that could have been thoroughly vented last summer have festered to the point where many of the volunteers have become not just concerned, but very angry.  It's my hope that the meeting will be a chance for some constructive discussion about the good and bad of the event - a chance for everyone to learn so the same mistakes are not made again.
 I plan on attending, so will report after.

Labels: , ,

Righeimer's Pension Solution


Almost NOBODY has watched the Time Warner Cable Local Edition presentation from February, 2014 (Published on 2/25/14) in which Leslie Leyton interviews Costa Mesa Mayor Jim Righeimer about the current condition of our pension problem.


This short tape - 4:30 long - is well worth the time it takes to watch it.  As you go through the tape you'll find that the mayor has new information for us.  Like, for example, the unfunded pension liability that he and his sycophants have been yapping about as being "$238 million" is, according to Righeimer, actually $600 million!

And, his solution for our city is to have all the current employees abandon their present pension plans and return to the old formula going forward.

He also mentions municipal bankruptcy during his little presentation. 

I've provided some snippets for you to listen for as you watch the tape.  Enjoy...

Referring to the pension problem, "... what you can really do to fix it, which isn't really a lot.  The state has to fix this problem, clearly."

"Our city had a liability for pensions ten years ago of 200 million.  We now have a liability of 600 million."

"...service insolvency - which is you just don't do things.  All of a sudden you're not fixing the streets, you're not fixing the curbs, you're not taking care of the flood control, the parks, whatever other issues you have.  It just doesn't get done."

"Our city, and most cities in Orange County, we have a lot of money, we just do.  We may spend it improperly, but we still got money.  So, there will be other cities in the state that will file BK before we do, and in that process we'll finally get the state to solve the problem."

In response to a question about how long? "Probably five, six years at the most you're gonna have, maybe, another half dozen cities file BK."

"What we need to have happen is existing employees to go back to the old pension plan going forward."

"It's not gonna happen until there's the political will..."

Take four and half minutes and watch the tape...


Labels: , , , ,